Key Takeaways
1. Blizzard's Foundational Ethos: Quality and Chaos
Adham decided that anyone who didn’t play games wasn’t welcome at Silicon & Synapse.
Early days. Founded in 1991 by college students Allen Adham and Mike Morhaime as Silicon & Synapse (later Chaos Studios, then Blizzard Entertainment), the company was built on a passion for video games. Their initial strategy involved taking on conversion contracts for other publishers to stay afloat, while dreaming of creating their own original titles. This period was characterized by a "management by chaos" approach, where ideas were debated intensely until consensus was reached, often fueled by caffeine and competitive gaming sessions.
Gamer-first culture. Adham and Morhaime fostered a culture where deep understanding and love for games were paramount. Prospective employees were rigorously quizzed on their gaming knowledge, ensuring that everyone shared the same core philosophy: make games they wanted to play. This led to a tight-knit, almost fraternal atmosphere where work and social life intertwined, with employees constantly discussing and playing games together.
First hits. This unique approach led to critical successes like Rock N’ Roll Racing and The Lost Vikings. Their breakthrough came with Warcraft: Orcs & Humans, a real-time strategy game that polished the Dune II formula with multiplayer. This was followed by Diablo, a dungeon-crawler that introduced randomized loot and a real-time combat system, solidifying Blizzard's reputation for quality and innovation in the burgeoning video game industry.
2. The Double-Edged Sword of "When It's Ready"
Although they didn’t use the words at the time, this was the foundation of what would become a company mantra for decades to come: It’ll be ready when it’s ready.
Quality over deadlines. Blizzard's commitment to quality was famously encapsulated by its "it'll be ready when it's ready" philosophy. This mantra emerged after Diablo missed the crucial 1996 holiday season but still became a massive hit, proving that a great game could succeed regardless of its release window. This approach allowed developers the time to iterate, polish, and ensure their games met exceptionally high standards.
The cost of delays. While this philosophy often resulted in critically acclaimed and commercially successful games, it also led to significant delays and missed opportunities. Projects like StarCraft II and Diablo III faced years of extended development, frustrating both players and corporate owners. The company's reluctance to rush products, though noble, sometimes meant losing momentum or failing to capitalize on emerging market trends.
Internal friction. The extended development cycles and the pursuit of perfection often led to intense crunch periods, particularly in the final months of a game's production. This created internal friction, as employees sacrificed personal lives for the sake of the game, and sometimes felt that management's promises of "almost done" were perpetually unfulfilled. The balance between quality and employee well-being became a recurring challenge for Blizzard.
3. World of Warcraft: A Transformative, Yet Demanding Success
Nobody really anticipated how big it was going to be.
Unprecedented scale. World of Warcraft (WoW), launched in 2004, became Blizzard's most monumental success, transforming the company from a respected studio into a global entertainment empire. It broke sales records, quickly amassed millions of subscribers, and became a cultural phenomenon, with a player base larger than many countries. This success, however, brought immense pressure and new operational challenges.
Live service demands. Unlike previous Blizzard titles, WoW was a "live-service" game, requiring a constant stream of new content, bug fixes, and server maintenance to retain its paying subscribers. This necessitated a massive expansion of Blizzard's workforce, particularly in customer service and engineering, and shifted development focus from discrete projects to ongoing support and rapid expansion releases. The game's success also led to the creation of BlizzCon, an annual convention celebrating Blizzard's community.
The "WoW Curse." The game's overwhelming profitability and resource demands inadvertently impacted other projects, often pulling talent from other teams or delaying their development. The "WoW Curse" referred to the phenomenon where other games struggled to gain traction or resources in the shadow of WoW's dominance. This created a two-tiered system within Blizzard, where the WoW team held significant power and influence.
4. The Pervasive "Boys' Club" Culture and Its Consequences
For most of Blizzard’s employees, this was an atmosphere that facilitated success and made them love going to work every day. But for the few women who worked there, or those who might have wanted to? The frat house image was much more complicated.
Fraternal beginnings. Blizzard's early culture, described as a "frat house," fostered camaraderie among its predominantly male staff, who bonded over games, pranks, and parties. This environment, while enjoyable for many, created an exclusionary atmosphere for women and those who didn't fit the mold. The company's hiring ethos, prioritizing "hardcore gamers," inadvertently perpetuated a lack of diversity.
Blurred lines. The intense work environment and intertwined social lives led to blurred boundaries between professional and personal conduct. Relationships between colleagues, including those with significant power imbalances, were common. This often created uncomfortable situations, particularly for women, who sometimes faced unwanted advances or felt pressured to participate in a party culture that included alcohol-fueled antics and trips to strip clubs.
Systemic issues. Despite efforts to professionalize, systemic issues persisted. Women were underrepresented in leadership, faced compensation disparities, and often had their concerns dismissed by HR, especially if incidents occurred off-campus. The "whisper network" emerged as women warned each other about problematic individuals, highlighting a failure of formal channels to address misconduct effectively.
5. Activision's Influence: Prioritizing Predictability and Profit
If you want to run an institutional-level company, having people who know how to run businesses is in many respects a lot more valuable than having people who know how to make video games.
Clash of philosophies. The 2008 merger with Activision, forming Activision Blizzard, introduced a stark contrast in corporate philosophies. Bobby Kotick, Activision's CEO, prioritized predictable revenue growth, efficiency, and annual franchises, often drawing analogies to consumer packaged goods. This clashed with Blizzard's "player-first" ethos, its willingness to delay games, and its aversion to aggressive monetization.
Increased pressure. Post-merger, especially after Kotick regained control from Vivendi in 2013, Activision exerted increasing pressure on Blizzard. Kotick and his lieutenants questioned Blizzard's slower development cycles, its large non-development departments, and its perceived failure to "extract enough value" from its IPs. This led to the implementation of "long-range planning" and a push for more consistent release schedules, particularly for World of Warcraft expansions.
Cultural erosion. The appointment of Armin Zerza as Blizzard's CFO in 2015, a figure with a strong business background but little gaming experience, symbolized Activision's growing influence. Zerza's focus on revenue, KPIs, and cost-cutting, often expressed bluntly, alienated many Blizzard veterans who felt the company's player-first values were being compromised. This shift contributed to a growing sense of disillusionment and a perception that Blizzard was becoming "just another corporation."
6. The Cost of Innovation and Missed Opportunities
I think Blizzard’s forte was really leaving a bunch of money on the table, and investing in, the term we used was, the ‘player sentiment bank account.’
Unrealized potential. Blizzard's commitment to quality and its "when it's ready" approach, while yielding hits, also led to missed opportunities and costly failures. The company famously passed on turning Battle.net into a digital store for all PC games, a decision that Pat Wyatt believed was short-sighted. Similarly, they initially dismissed the burgeoning MOBA genre, allowing Riot Games to create League of Legends and dominate a market Blizzard could have led.
Titan's collapse. The most significant failure was "Titan," an ambitious next-generation MMORPG that spent nearly seven years and $80 million in development before being rebooted. The project suffered from a lack of clear vision, internal political battles between creative leads, and an inability to coalesce its disparate ideas. Its eventual cancellation was a major blow to Blizzard's reputation and a source of immense frustration for the developers involved.
The "Blizzard Tax." The company's perfectionism and slow pace, combined with lower salaries compared to competitors, became known as the "Blizzard Tax." Employees accepted less pay for the prestige of working at Blizzard, but this loyalty was tested by opaque bonus systems and rising living costs in Irvine. The company's reluctance to adapt to faster development cycles and new market trends, like mobile gaming, meant it often lagged behind competitors in capitalizing on lucrative opportunities.
7. Eroding Trust: A Series of Public and Internal Missteps
For the first time in three decades, it had released a bad game.
Warcraft III: Reforged. The release of Warcraft III: Reforged in 2020 marked a significant low point, becoming the worst-reviewed game in Blizzard's history. Promised as a comprehensive remaster with updated cinematics and revamped levels, the final product was buggy, incomplete, and removed features from the original game. This debacle shattered player trust and signaled to many that Blizzard's commitment to quality was faltering.
Diablo Immortal backlash. The announcement of Diablo Immortal, a mobile game, at BlizzCon 2018 was met with widespread fan outrage. Players, expecting a Diablo IV announcement, felt betrayed by the focus on mobile gaming, which many associated with exploitative microtransactions. The infamous "Do you guys not have phones?" comment from a developer became a meme, symbolizing Blizzard's perceived disconnect from its core audience.
Esports missteps. The Overwatch League, an ambitious venture to create the "NFL of video games," struggled with viewership, team owner dissatisfaction, and a business model reliant on in-person events that were disrupted by the pandemic. Its eventual cancellation, along with the abrupt shutdown of Heroes of the Storm esports, further eroded trust among fans and professional players who felt Blizzard had abandoned its commitments.
8. The Reckoning: Confronting Systemic Misconduct
To the Blizzard women who experienced any of these things, I am extremely sorry that I failed you.
California lawsuit. In July 2021, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, alleging widespread sexual discrimination and misconduct. The lawsuit, though sometimes inaccurate, resonated deeply with many current and former female employees who shared stories of harassment, unequal pay, and an HR department that failed to address their complaints.
Leadership failures. The lawsuit brought to light long-standing cultural issues, including the "Cosby suite" allegations and instances of high-ranking male employees engaging in inappropriate behavior with impunity. Mike Morhaime, Blizzard's former president, publicly apologized, acknowledging his failure to address toxicity. The crisis led to the firing of several key leaders, including Diablo IV's director and lead designer, and a broader internal reckoning.
Employee activism. In response to the lawsuit and initial "tone-deaf" corporate responses, Blizzard employees organized walkouts and formed "A Better ABK" to demand accountability and cultural change. This unprecedented activism, including a petition signed by nearly two thousand employees calling for Bobby Kotick's resignation, highlighted the deep-seated dissatisfaction within the company and forced Activision Blizzard to acknowledge the severity of the crisis.
9. Microsoft's Acquisition: A Hopeful, Yet Uncertain Future
What they were trying to communicate to us was really wanting to get to know us, ‘We’re not coming in with a master plan. How can we help you?’ It was awesome.
A new chapter. In January 2022, Microsoft announced its intent to acquire Activision Blizzard for $69 billion, the largest deal in video game history. This news, finalized in October 2023, brought a mix of cautious optimism and uncertainty to Blizzard employees. Many hoped it would signal an end to Bobby Kotick's influence and Activision's pressure for short-term profits, allowing Blizzard to return to its player-first roots.
Xbox's approach. Phil Spencer, head of Xbox, quickly sought to reassure Blizzard staff, emphasizing autonomy and a desire to understand and support their creative processes rather than imposing a "master plan." This contrasted sharply with Activision's previous approach, offering hope that Blizzard's unique culture and development philosophy might be better preserved under Microsoft's broader, less revenue-dependent umbrella.
Lingering challenges. Despite the optimism, Blizzard still faces significant challenges. The company's reputation has been damaged, talent attrition remains a concern, and the long-term success of key titles like Overwatch 2 and Diablo IV is yet to be fully determined. The acquisition represents a chance for a fresh start, but the path to fully restoring Blizzard's "magic" and addressing its deep-seated cultural issues remains a complex and ongoing journey.
Last updated:
