Логика

Ясное мышление освещает путь сквозь самые запутанные жизненные проблемы, а эти книги вооружают читателей проверенными временем инструментами рассуждения, аргументации и критического анализа. Будь то распутывание сложных решений или выявление тонких логических ошибок, эта коллекция укрепляет мыслительные способности, необходимые для уверенной и ясной навигации во всё более сложном мире.

Логика Саммари книг

Логика ставок на спорт

— Эд Миллер • 2019

Forget picking winners. The real money in sports betting is hidden in the market's pricing mistakes.

3.97

500+

🏈 Sports Betting 📊 Market Microstructure ℹ️ Information Asymmetry 💱 Arbitrage Strategy 🎲 Odds And Probability

Иммерсивные

Логика ставок на спорт

Forget picking winners. The real money in sports betting is hidden in the market's pricing mistakes.

— Эд Миллер 2019 239 стр.

3.97

500+ оценок

🏈 Sports Betting 📊 Market Microstructure ℹ️ Information Asymmetry 💱 Arbitrage Strategy 🎲 Odds And Probability

A Rulebook for Arguments

— Anthony Weston • 1986

Argument isn't combat. It's construction. A slim guide to building claims that actually hold up.

3.82

3 000+

🧠 Critical Thinking 📐 Informal Logic 🏗️ Argument Structure 🔍 Evidence Evaluation ✍️ Writing Arguments

Иммерсивные

A Rulebook for Arguments

Argument isn't combat. It's construction. A slim guide to building claims that actually hold up.

— Anthony Weston 1986 120 стр.

3.82

3 000+ оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking 📐 Informal Logic 🏗️ Argument Structure 🔍 Evidence Evaluation ✍️ Writing Arguments

Mathematical Thinking - For People Who Hate Math

— Albert Rutherford • 2021

Math class already gave you a reasoning toolkit. Put it to work, zero equations required.

3.58

158

Mathematical Thinking - For People Who Hate Math Саммари

Иммерсивные

Mathematical Thinking - For People Who Hate Math

Math class already gave you a reasoning toolkit. Put it to work, zero equations required.

— Albert Rutherford 2021 155 стр.

3.58

158 оценок

Asking the Right Questions

— M. Neil Browne • 1981

Spot weak arguments, hidden assumptions, and bad statistics: a guide to thinking for yourself.

3.97

1 000+

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Argument Analysis ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🧩 Cognitive Biases 📊 Evidence Evaluation

Asking the Right Questions

Spot weak arguments, hidden assumptions, and bad statistics: a guide to thinking for yourself.

— M. Neil Browne 1981 212 стр.

3.97

1 000+ оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Argument Analysis ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🧩 Cognitive Biases 📊 Evidence Evaluation

Being Logical

— D.Q. McInerny • 2004

Spot fallacies, build arguments, and keep your own mind honest: logic for everyday life.

3.75

2 000+

🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 💬 Argumentation 🏠 Everyday Logic 🔍 Evidence Evaluation

Being Logical

Spot fallacies, build arguments, and keep your own mind honest: logic for everyday life.

— D.Q. McInerny 2004 120 стр.

3.75

2 000+ оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 💬 Argumentation 🏠 Everyday Logic 🔍 Evidence Evaluation

How to Win Every Argument

— Madsen Pirie • 2006

The fallacies that win arguments: how to use them, spot them, and never get tripped again.

3.50

1 000+

🧠 Logical Fallacies 🤔 Critical Thinking 🗣️ Debate Tactics 🎯 Persuasion 🔍 Cognitive Biases

How to Win Every Argument

The fallacies that win arguments: how to use them, spot them, and never get tripped again.

— Madsen Pirie 2006 182 стр.

3.50

1 000+ оценок

🧠 Logical Fallacies 🤔 Critical Thinking 🗣️ Debate Tactics 🎯 Persuasion 🔍 Cognitive Biases

Socratic Logic

— Peter Kreeft • 2003

Reason with precision, argue with force, and catch every fallacy: a classical logic course.

4.31

468

🧠 Critical Thinking 🏛️ Classical Education 💬 Argumentation 🚫 Logical Fallacies ❓ Socratic Method

Socratic Logic

Reason with precision, argue with force, and catch every fallacy: a classical logic course.

— Peter Kreeft 2003 397 стр.

4.31

468 оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking 🏛️ Classical Education 💬 Argumentation 🚫 Logical Fallacies ❓ Socratic Method

The Irrational Ape

— David Robert Grimes • 2019

Your brain runs on faulty code, and politicians, advertisers, and quacks have the manual.

4.26

1 000+

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🧩 Logical Fallacies 💭 Critical Thinking 🥼 Pseudoscience 🕵️ Conspiracy Theories

The Irrational Ape

Your brain runs on faulty code, and politicians, advertisers, and quacks have the manual.

— David Robert Grimes 2019 320 стр.

4.26

1 000+ оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🧩 Logical Fallacies 💭 Critical Thinking 🥼 Pseudoscience 🕵️ Conspiracy Theories

The Logic of Sense

— Gilles Deleuze • 1969

Sense is not a thing but an event, a surface effect where language meets the world.

4.29

1 000+

🧩 Post-Structuralism 💬 Philosophy Of Language 🏛️ Stoic Logic 🌫️ Incorporeal Events 🎭 Paradox And Nonsense

The Logic of Sense

Sense is not a thing but an event, a surface effect where language meets the world.

— Gilles Deleuze 1969 393 стр.

4.29

1 000+ оценок

🧩 Post-Structuralism 💬 Philosophy Of Language 🏛️ Stoic Logic 🌫️ Incorporeal Events 🎭 Paradox And Nonsense

The Logic of Scientific Discovery

— Karl Popper • 1934

You cannot prove a theory true, only false. The asymmetry that separates science from dogma.

4.03

5 000+

🔬 Philosophy Of Science 🧪 Scientific Method 🧩 Problem Of Induction 📊 Empiricism 💭 Critical Rationalism

The Logic of Scientific Discovery

You cannot prove a theory true, only false. The asymmetry that separates science from dogma.

— Karl Popper 1934 544 стр.

4.03

5 000+ оценок

🔬 Philosophy Of Science 🧪 Scientific Method 🧩 Problem Of Induction 📊 Empiricism 💭 Critical Rationalism

Введение в логику

— Ирвинг М. Копи • 1953

How to spot a flawed argument: the logic toolkit from Aristotle to truth tables.

4.07

500+

🧮 Formal Logic 🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 📋 Argument Analysis 🔬 Scientific Methodology

Введение в логику

How to spot a flawed argument: the logic toolkit from Aristotle to truth tables.

— Ирвинг М. Копи 1953 683 стр.

4.07

500+ оценок

🧮 Formal Logic 🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 📋 Argument Analysis 🔬 Scientific Methodology

The Art of Logic in an Illogical World

— Eugenia Cheng • 2018

Mathematical logic isn't about numbers. It's about untangling the arguments tearing us apart.

3.47

2 000+

🧮 Mathematical Thinking 🔄 Systems Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔍 Abstract Reasoning ↔️ Polarization

The Art of Logic in an Illogical World

Mathematical logic isn't about numbers. It's about untangling the arguments tearing us apart.

— Eugenia Cheng 2018 320 стр.

3.47

2 000+ оценок

🧮 Mathematical Thinking 🔄 Systems Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔍 Abstract Reasoning ↔️ Polarization

The Art of Thinking In Systems

— Steven Schuster • 2018

Why your fixes backfire: the feedback loops, delays, and blind spots hiding in plain sight.

3.16

500+

🧩 Systems Thinking 🧠 Mental Models 🤔 Critical Thinking ♟️ Strategic Thinking 🗺️ Decision Frameworks

The Art of Thinking In Systems

Why your fixes backfire: the feedback loops, delays, and blind spots hiding in plain sight.

— Steven Schuster 2018 180 стр.

3.16

500+ оценок

🧩 Systems Thinking 🧠 Mental Models 🤔 Critical Thinking ♟️ Strategic Thinking 🗺️ Decision Frameworks

Language, Truth and Logic

— Alfred Jules Ayer • 1936

A single test separates meaningful statements from nonsense, and most of philosophy fails it.

3.75

4 000+

🧠 Logical Positivism 🔍 Analytic Philosophy 💬 Philosophy Of Language 🏛️ Vienna Circle 👁️ Empiricism

Language, Truth and Logic

A single test separates meaningful statements from nonsense, and most of philosophy fails it.

— Alfred Jules Ayer 1936 160 стр.

3.75

4 000+ оценок

🧠 Logical Positivism 🔍 Analytic Philosophy 💬 Philosophy Of Language 🏛️ Vienna Circle 👁️ Empiricism

Think Again

— Walter Sinnott-Armstrong • 2018

Turn arguments from fights into tools: spot the fallacies, build sound cases, refute with civility.

3.34

500+

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Informal Logic 🪞 Cognitive Biases ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🗣️ Argumentation

Think Again

Turn arguments from fights into tools: spot the fallacies, build sound cases, refute with civility.

— Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 2018 288 стр.

3.34

500+ оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Informal Logic 🪞 Cognitive Biases ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🗣️ Argumentation

Think Smarter

— Michael Kallet • 2014

Why smart people make dumb calls: a clarity toolkit that fixes the real problem first.

3.78

372

🧩 Business Problem Solving 🧠 Mental Models 📋 Decision Frameworks 🗂️ Structured Problem Solving ⚠️ Cognitive Bias Awareness

Think Smarter

Why smart people make dumb calls: a clarity toolkit that fixes the real problem first.

— Michael Kallet 2014 240 стр.

3.78

372 оценок

🧩 Business Problem Solving 🧠 Mental Models 📋 Decision Frameworks 🗂️ Structured Problem Solving ⚠️ Cognitive Bias Awareness

Logically Fallacious

— Bo Bennett • 2012

A catalog of 300+ reasoning errors, with techniques to catch them in everyday arguments.

3.85

500+

🚩 Logical Fallacies 🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Cognitive Biases 🗣️ Debate Skills 📺 Media Literacy

Logically Fallacious

A catalog of 300+ reasoning errors, with techniques to catch them in everyday arguments.

— Bo Bennett 2012 256 стр.

3.85

500+ оценок

🚩 Logical Fallacies 🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Cognitive Biases 🗣️ Debate Skills 📺 Media Literacy

Attacking Faulty Reasoning

— T. Edward Damer • 1980

Every bad argument breaks a specific rule. Spot the rule, and the response becomes clear.

3.99

208

🧠 Informal Logic ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔍 Argument Evaluation 💬 Rational Discourse 🎯 Intellectual Honesty

Attacking Faulty Reasoning

Every bad argument breaks a specific rule. Spot the rule, and the response becomes clear.

— T. Edward Damer 1980 256 стр.

3.99

208 оценок

🧠 Informal Logic ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔍 Argument Evaluation 💬 Rational Discourse 🎯 Intellectual Honesty

The Logical Thinking Process

— H. William Dettmer • 2007

A systematic method to identify and break the one bottleneck holding your entire organization back.

4.38

160

🧠 Systems Thinking 🔗 Constraint Management 🔁 Continuous Improvement 🔍 Root Cause Analysis 🧩 Logical Frameworks

The Logical Thinking Process

A systematic method to identify and break the one bottleneck holding your entire organization back.

— H. William Dettmer 2007 444 стр.

4.38

160 оценок

🧠 Systems Thinking 🔗 Constraint Management 🔁 Continuous Improvement 🔍 Root Cause Analysis 🧩 Logical Frameworks

Elements of Critical Thinking

— Albert Rutherford • 2018

Your mind skips evidence, invents stories, and trusts charming liars. A guide for rigorous thinking.

3.99

109

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🤔 Critical Reasoning 🚫 Fallacy Detection 🔍 Skepticism 📖 Active Reading

Elements of Critical Thinking

Your mind skips evidence, invents stories, and trusts charming liars. A guide for rigorous thinking.

— Albert Rutherford 2018 278 стр.

3.99

109 оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🤔 Critical Reasoning 🚫 Fallacy Detection 🔍 Skepticism 📖 Active Reading

Crimes Against Logic

— Jamie Whyte • 2004

Most public arguments are crime scenes. A philosopher dusts for the fingerprints of fallacy.

3.67

1 000+

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Spotting Fallacies 🗣️ Public Discourse 🤨 Skepticism 📰 Media Criticism

Crimes Against Logic

Most public arguments are crime scenes. A philosopher dusts for the fingerprints of fallacy.

— Jamie Whyte 2004 157 стр.

3.67

1 000+ оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking 🔍 Spotting Fallacies 🗣️ Public Discourse 🤨 Skepticism 📰 Media Criticism

Learn To Think in Systems

— Albert Rutherford • 2019

How to spot the hidden loops that turn quick fixes into worse problems.

3.73

172

🧠 Systems Thinking 🧩 Mental Models 📈 System Dynamics ⚠️ Unintended Consequences 📉 Growth Constraints

Learn To Think in Systems

How to spot the hidden loops that turn quick fixes into worse problems.

— Albert Rutherford 2019 310 стр.

3.73

172 оценок

🧠 Systems Thinking 🧩 Mental Models 📈 System Dynamics ⚠️ Unintended Consequences 📉 Growth Constraints

Good Thinking

— David Robert Grimes • 2021

Bad logic corrupts medicine, politics, and media. A physicist shows how to spot it.

4.29

312

🧠 Cognitive Biases ⚖️ Logical Fallacies 🔬 Scientific Skepticism 💭 Critical Thinking 📰 Media Literacy

Good Thinking

Bad logic corrupts medicine, politics, and media. A physicist shows how to spot it.

— David Robert Grimes 2021 400 стр.

4.29

312 оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases ⚖️ Logical Fallacies 🔬 Scientific Skepticism 💭 Critical Thinking 📰 Media Literacy

Системный мыслитель — Аналитические навыки

— Альберт Резерфорд • 2019

The step-by-step process for thinking clearly, spotting fallacies, and making data-backed decisions.

3.46

107

🧠 Analytical Thinking 🧩 Problem-Solving 🧱 Mental Models 🪤 Cognitive Biases 📊 Data Literacy

Системный мыслитель — Аналитические навыки

The step-by-step process for thinking clearly, spotting fallacies, and making data-backed decisions.

— Альберт Резерфорд 2019 192 стр.

3.46

107 оценок

🧠 Analytical Thinking 🧩 Problem-Solving 🧱 Mental Models 🪤 Cognitive Biases 📊 Data Literacy

The Edge of Reason

— Julian Baggini • 2016

Reason is not sterile logic. It depends on judgment, emotion, and the temperament we bring.

3.97

141

🧠 Reason And Judgment ⛓️ Limits Of Reason 💭 Emotion And Reasoning 🔬 Science And Subjectivity ⚖️ Moral Reasoning

The Edge of Reason

Reason is not sterile logic. It depends on judgment, emotion, and the temperament we bring.

— Julian Baggini 2016 272 стр.

3.97

141 оценок

🧠 Reason And Judgment ⛓️ Limits Of Reason 💭 Emotion And Reasoning 🔬 Science And Subjectivity ⚖️ Moral Reasoning

Critical Thinking

— Tracy Bowell • 2001

Map an argument's structure, test its logic, and know when rhetoric is doing the work.

3.82

249

🔍 Argument Analysis 🧩 Informal Logic ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔗 Deductive Reasoning 🎯 Rhetorical Analysis

Critical Thinking

Map an argument's structure, test its logic, and know when rhetoric is doing the work.

— Tracy Bowell 2001 294 стр.

3.82

249 оценок

🔍 Argument Analysis 🧩 Informal Logic ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🔗 Deductive Reasoning 🎯 Rhetorical Analysis

The Art of Logical Thinking

— William Walker Atkinson • 1909

Master the machinery of valid arguments and detect the logical flaws that fool most people.

3.42

117

🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🏛️ Classical Logic 🔩 Mental Discipline 🗣️ Argumentation

The Art of Logical Thinking

Master the machinery of valid arguments and detect the logical flaws that fool most people.

— William Walker Atkinson 1909 66 стр.

3.42

117 оценок

🧠 Critical Thinking ⚠️ Logical Fallacies 🏛️ Classical Logic 🔩 Mental Discipline 🗣️ Argumentation

How to Become a Really Good Pain in the Ass

— Christopher W. DiCarlo • 2007

Why the most annoying person in the room is often right, and how to become them.

3.58

270

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🔍 Fallacy Spotting 📊 Evidence Evaluation 🗣️ Informal Logic ❓ Socratic Method

How to Become a Really Good Pain in the Ass

Why the most annoying person in the room is often right, and how to become them.

— Christopher W. DiCarlo 2007 398 стр.

3.58

270 оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🔍 Fallacy Spotting 📊 Evidence Evaluation 🗣️ Informal Logic ❓ Socratic Method

Mastering Logical Fallacies

— Michael Withey • 2016

The patterns behind every bad argument you have ever lost to, named and disarmed.

3.69

500+

💡 Critical Thinking 🔍 Logical Fallacies 🧩 Cognitive Biases 🎤 Debate Skills 🛡️ Persuasion Resistance

Mastering Logical Fallacies

The patterns behind every bad argument you have ever lost to, named and disarmed.

— Michael Withey 2016 200 стр.

3.69

500+ оценок

💡 Critical Thinking 🔍 Logical Fallacies 🧩 Cognitive Biases 🎤 Debate Skills 🛡️ Persuasion Resistance

I Think, Therefore I Laugh

— John Allen Paulos • 1985

A mathematician's tour of logic's strangest corners, where every lesson arrives disguised as a joke.

3.48

245

🗣️ Philosophy Of Language 🔄 Logical Paradoxes 🔬 Philosophy Of Science 📝 Analytic Philosophy 📚 Popular Philosophy

I Think, Therefore I Laugh

A mathematician's tour of logic's strangest corners, where every lesson arrives disguised as a joke.

— John Allen Paulos 1985 192 стр.

3.48

245 оценок

🗣️ Philosophy Of Language 🔄 Logical Paradoxes 🔬 Philosophy Of Science 📝 Analytic Philosophy 📚 Popular Philosophy

Doing Philosophy

— Timothy Williamson • 2018

Philosophy is a science that tests ideas with thought experiments, and the best explanation wins.

3.67

213

🛠️ Philosophical Methodology 🔍 Analytic Philosophy 🧪 Thought Experiments 🔎 Abductive Reasoning 📐 Logic In Philosophy

Doing Philosophy

Philosophy is a science that tests ideas with thought experiments, and the best explanation wins.

— Timothy Williamson 2018 166 стр.

3.67

213 оценок

🛠️ Philosophical Methodology 🔍 Analytic Philosophy 🧪 Thought Experiments 🔎 Abductive Reasoning 📐 Logic In Philosophy

Come, Let Us Reason

— Norman L. Geisler • 1990

A Christian philosopher on why most arguments fail, and how to construct ones that hold.

4.02

194

🧮 Formal Logic 🧠 Critical Thinking ✝️ Christian Philosophy 🚫 Logical Fallacies 📊 Inductive Reasoning

Come, Let Us Reason

A Christian philosopher on why most arguments fail, and how to construct ones that hold.

— Norman L. Geisler 1990 232 стр.

4.02

194 оценок

🧮 Formal Logic 🧠 Critical Thinking ✝️ Christian Philosophy 🚫 Logical Fallacies 📊 Inductive Reasoning

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

— Ludwig Wittgenstein • 1921

Language pictures facts but cannot contain ethics, value, or the mystical; these lie beyond words.

4.10

22 000+

📝 Philosophy Of Language 🧠 Analytic Philosophy ➡️ Meaning And Reference 📐 Logical Form 🚫 Limits Of Thought

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Language pictures facts but cannot contain ethics, value, or the mystical; these lie beyond words.

— Ludwig Wittgenstein 1921 142 стр.

4.10

22 000+ оценок

📝 Philosophy Of Language 🧠 Analytic Philosophy ➡️ Meaning And Reference 📐 Logical Form 🚫 Limits Of Thought

Once Upon A Number

— John Allen Paulos • 1998

Stories and statistics are two languages your brain was never designed to reconcile.

3.36

228

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🔢 Popular Mathematics 🔍 Philosophy Of Math 📖 Narrative Theory 🎲 Coincidence And Chance

Once Upon A Number

Stories and statistics are two languages your brain was never designed to reconcile.

— John Allen Paulos 1998 224 стр.

3.36

228 оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🔢 Popular Mathematics 🔍 Philosophy Of Math 📖 Narrative Theory 🎲 Coincidence And Chance

Incompleteness

— Rebecca Goldstein • 2005

A genius turned a paradox into a proof that broke the promise of a complete mathematics.

3.99

1 000+

📐 Philosophy Of Math 📜 Intellectual History 🔁 Self-Reference 📏 Formalism 🔬 Logical Positivism

Incompleteness

A genius turned a paradox into a proof that broke the promise of a complete mathematics.

— Rebecca Goldstein 2005 300 стр.

3.99

1 000+ оценок

📐 Philosophy Of Math 📜 Intellectual History 🔁 Self-Reference 📏 Formalism 🔬 Logical Positivism

How to Think About Weird Things

— Theodore Schick Jr. • 1994

A method for evaluating any extraordinary claim, from alien abductions to miracle cures.

3.97

500+

🔬 Scientific Skepticism 👻 Paranormal Claims 🪤 Logical Fallacies 🧠 Cognitive Biases 📚 Epistemology

How to Think About Weird Things

A method for evaluating any extraordinary claim, from alien abductions to miracle cures.

— Theodore Schick Jr. 1994 368 стр.

3.97

500+ оценок

🔬 Scientific Skepticism 👻 Paranormal Claims 🪤 Logical Fallacies 🧠 Cognitive Biases 📚 Epistemology

Introducing Logic

— Bill Mayblin • 2001

Logic built your computer, constrains science, and contains a paradox that broke mathematics itself.

3.61

1 000+

🧮 Formal Logic 📜 History Of Logic 🎨 Illustrated Guides 🧠 Logical Reasoning 🔄 Paradoxes

Introducing Logic

Logic built your computer, constrains science, and contains a paradox that broke mathematics itself.

— Bill Mayblin 2001 181 стр.

3.61

1 000+ оценок

🧮 Formal Logic 📜 History Of Logic 🎨 Illustrated Guides 🧠 Logical Reasoning 🔄 Paradoxes

Symbolic Logic And The Game Of Logic

— Lewis Carroll • 1958

Turn logic into a game: three rules, diagrams and counters, replacing nineteen dense textbook forms.

3.94

176

🧠 Formal Logic 🔣 Symbolic Logic 🧩 Logic Puzzles ⚠️ Fallacy Detection 🔗 Syllogistic Logic

Symbolic Logic And The Game Of Logic

Turn logic into a game: three rules, diagrams and counters, replacing nineteen dense textbook forms.

— Lewis Carroll 1958 348 стр.

3.94

176 оценок

🧠 Formal Logic 🔣 Symbolic Logic 🧩 Logic Puzzles ⚠️ Fallacy Detection 🔗 Syllogistic Logic

Master Critical Thinking

— Henrik Rodgers • 2019

Critical thinking predicts life outcomes better than IQ does. The mental habits that build it.

3.15

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🌊 Emotional Regulation ⚖️ Decision Making 📰 Information Literacy 🗣️ Self-Talk

Master Critical Thinking

Critical thinking predicts life outcomes better than IQ does. The mental habits that build it.

— Henrik Rodgers 2019 135 стр.

3.15

27 оценок

🧠 Cognitive Biases 🌊 Emotional Regulation ⚖️ Decision Making 📰 Information Literacy 🗣️ Self-Talk

Godel's Proof

— Ernest Nagel • 1958

Arithmetic cannot prove its own consistency. The man who proved that was twenty-five.

4.19

5 000+

🧮 Mathematical Logic 🏛️ Foundations Of Mathematics 🧩 Incompleteness 🪞 Self-Reference ⚙️ Formal Systems

Godel's Proof

Arithmetic cannot prove its own consistency. The man who proved that was twenty-five.

— Ernest Nagel 1958 160 стр.

4.19

5 000+ оценок

🧮 Mathematical Logic 🏛️ Foundations Of Mathematics 🧩 Incompleteness 🪞 Self-Reference ⚙️ Formal Systems

The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays

— Hilary Putnam • 2002

The wall between facts and values was a mistake; taking it down reshapes science and ethics.

3.98

176

❓ Fact And Value 🤔 Metaethics 🗣️ Philosophy Of Language 🔧 Pragmatism 🧪 Logical Positivism

The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays

The wall between facts and values was a mistake; taking it down reshapes science and ethics.

— Hilary Putnam 2002 204 стр.

3.98

176 оценок

❓ Fact And Value 🤔 Metaethics 🗣️ Philosophy Of Language 🔧 Pragmatism 🧪 Logical Positivism

Compare Features	Free	Pro
📖 Read Summaries Read unlimited summaries. Free users get 3 per month
🎧 Listen to Summaries Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages	—
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks Free users are limited to 4	—
📜 Unlimited History Free users are limited to 4	—
📥 Unlimited Downloads Free users are limited to 1	—

People love SoBrief

Join our global community of 600,000+ readers

★★★★★

This site is a total game-changer. I've been flying through book summaries like never before. Highly, highly recommend.

— Dave G

Worth my money and time, and really well made. I've never seen this quality of summaries on other websites. Very helpful!

— Em

Highly recommended!! Fantastic service. Perfect for those that want a little more than a teaser but not all the intricate details of a full audio book.

— Greg M