Key Takeaways
1. Corporate Media's Profit Motive Undermines Public Interest
The small number of corporations that control the media today may argue that they serve the commercial interests of consumers and shareholders, but they have little basis to argue that they serve the non-commercial public interest of citizens.
Profit over public service. The core issue with modern media is its relentless pursuit of profit, which has transformed it from a public service into a commercial enterprise. This shift means that sensationalism, celebrity, and entertainment often take precedence over in-depth investigative journalism and substantive reporting. For instance, CBS CEO Les Moonves openly admitted that Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, while "not good for America," was "damn good for CBS" due to boosted ratings and revenues.
Erosion of journalistic standards. Decades of deregulation, starting with the gutting of the 1934 Communications Act and the abolition of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, paved the way for media consolidation. By 2012, just six corporations controlled 90% of U.S. media, prioritizing audience capture for advertisers over journalistic ethics. This environment fosters a "junk food news" culture, where trivial and sensational stories replace critical inquiry into corporate or government abuses.
Consequences for accountability. This commercial imperative creates a co-dependent relationship between media and powerful figures. Journalists often avoid tough questions to maintain access to celebrities and politicians, as exemplified by MSNBC's Chuck Todd admitting he wouldn't "bark" at guests for fear of losing them. This compromises the press's role as a watchdog, leaving the public ill-equipped to hold those in power accountable.
2. Education System Fails to Equip Citizens for a Media-Saturated World
Without an effective public education system and an independent and diverse press, the prerequisite conditions for a functional democracy do not exist.
Corporate influence on education. The U.S. education system has been systematically undermined by corporate interests, shifting its focus from fostering engaged citizens to producing market-ready consumers. Policies like the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) emphasized standardized testing and rote memorization, leading to a "dumbed-down" education that neglects critical thinking and media literacy. This leaves students unprepared to navigate a complex information landscape.
Lack of media literacy. Despite living in the most media-saturated society in history, American schools largely ignore media literacy education. A 2016 Stanford study found that:
- Less than 20% of middle school students could distinguish a news report from a sponsored story.
- Less than one-third could identify implicit bias in an article.
- 31% of teenagers admitted to sharing false articles online.
This deficiency makes the public highly susceptible to disinformation and manipulation.
Declining civic engagement. The long-term impact of this educational failure is a staggering decline in civic literacy and engagement. A 2016 study revealed that only 30% of individuals born after 1980 believe democracy is essential to their lives, compared to 72% of those born in the 1930s. This indicates a population increasingly alienated from democratic principles and vulnerable to authoritarian appeals.
3. Donald Trump: A Product and Exploiter of Systemic Vulnerabilities
Trump’s acquisition of television celebrity and political supremacy was made possible by decades of corporate domination of U.S. financial, media, and education systems.
Leveraging celebrity culture. Donald Trump was not an anomaly but a direct product of the commercialized media and education systems. His decades as a tabloid celebrity and game show host ("The Apprentice") provided him with a pre-existing platform and a master's degree in self-promotion. He understood that in a spectacle-driven media landscape, entertainment value often trumps substance, allowing him to dominate coverage and bypass traditional political vetting.
Exploiting public vulnerabilities. Trump skillfully capitalized on pre-existing societal weaknesses:
- Pervasive entertainment culture: His bombastic, unpredictable style provided constant "free entertainment" for ratings-hungry media.
- Hyper-partisanship: He fueled "us vs. them" tribalism, rallying his base against perceived enemies.
- Fragmented media landscape: He used Twitter to bypass traditional media, delivering unfiltered messages directly to millions, reinforcing their biases.
- Ineffective education: He openly embraced the "poorly educated," who lacked the critical tools to discern his disinformation.
A master of distraction. Trump's presidency continued his campaign tactics, using constant provocations, false assertions, and "media swerves" to deflect criticism and evade accountability. Whether it was his "nasty woman" comment, his conflicting statements on Charlottesville, or his attacks on the Russia investigation, he consistently redirected public attention away from substantive issues, proving himself a master of manipulation within a system ripe for it.
4. The "Post-Truth" Era: Normalizing Lies and Disinformation
In a post-truth era, the quality of statements is measured by how many people believe they are true, not if they are actually true.
Defining "post-truth." The "post-truth" era, declared Oxford's 2016 Word of the Year, describes circumstances where objective facts are less influential than appeals to emotion and personal belief. This environment allows for the deliberate propagation of "alternative facts," where truth becomes subjective and easily manipulated by those in power.
Trump's prolific falsehoods. President Trump epitomized this era, making over 10,000 false or misleading claims in his first two years. Examples include:
- Falsely claiming his tax cuts were the "biggest in American history."
- Fabricating trade deficit figures with Canada.
- Denying climate change despite overwhelming scientific consensus.
- Calling the Mueller investigation a "hoax" and "witch hunt."
These repeated falsehoods, often easily disproven, were designed to establish political supremacy and undermine critics.
Goebbels's shadow. This strategy echoes Joseph Goebbels's infamous propaganda principle: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." Trump's supporters, with 91% viewing him as their most accurate news source, demonstrate the effectiveness of this tactic. The normalization of chronic presidential lying creates an authoritarian climate where reality itself is contested.
5. Hyper-Partisanship Fuels Division and Distracts from Substance
Hyper-partisanship is not about actual policy differences, but about fostering a militant 'us versus them' mentality in regard to competing candidates, issues, and ideas.
Media's role in polarization. Corporate media, driven by ratings, has exacerbated hyper-partisanship by focusing on conflict and "us vs. them" narratives. Outlets like Fox News and MSNBC cultivate tribalism, where loyalty to party overrides factual accuracy or nuanced debate. This creates a contentious political culture, as evidenced by a 2014 Pew study showing partisan antipathy at an all-time high.
The "liberal media" trope. The conservative movement, influenced by figures like Lewis Powell and funded by billionaires like the Koch brothers, strategically cultivated the "liberal media" epithet. This tactic dismisses any critical coverage as biased, forcing journalists to overcompensate with "balanced" reporting that often creates false equivalencies or avoids tough questions, inadvertently benefiting anti-government narratives.
Consequences of tribalism. This extreme partisanship leads to:
- Blind allegiance: Voters support candidates (e.g., Roy Moore) despite serious allegations, simply because of party affiliation.
- Demonization of opponents: Trump's constant name-calling ("Crooked Hillary," "Lyin' Ted") and aggressive rhetoric ("lock her up") incite hatred and even violence, as seen with the pipe bomb suspect Cesar Sayoc.
- Distraction from policy: Debates devolve into personal attacks and trivialities, sidelining critical issues like climate change, economic inequality, and healthcare.
6. Fragmented Digital Media Creates Echo Chambers and Reinforces Bias
Search engines and social media increasingly customize the information users view to reinforce rather than challenge their confirmation biases—the tendencies to interpret new information as validation of one’s pre-existing beliefs and views.
The rise of digital silos. The internet and mobile devices have fragmented the media landscape, allowing individuals to curate personalized news feeds. Search engines and social media algorithms actively reinforce users' existing beliefs, creating "filter bubbles" or "echo chambers" where contradictory information is excluded. This cultivates a "post-truth" environment where multiple, often conflicting, realities coexist.
Surveillance capitalism and manipulation. Corporations engage in "surveillance capitalism," collecting user data to manipulate behavior through targeted advertising, bots, trolls, and memes. Cambridge Analytica's notorious data harvesting is just one example of how user data is weaponized to influence public opinion. This creates an "information war" where state actors and political campaigns covertly manipulate populations.
Trump's Twitter mastery. Trump masterfully exploited this fragmented landscape, using Twitter to bypass traditional media and directly reinforce his supporters' biases. His tweets, often containing disinformation, instantly reach millions, creating self-serving narratives that are then amplified by alt-right platforms like Breitbart. This direct line of communication allows him to control the message and evade accountability, even when his claims are easily disproven.
7. The Information War: A Battle for Public Consciousness
The human mind is the territory. If you aren’t a combatant, you are the territory. And once a combatant wins over a sufficient number of minds, they have the power to influence culture and society, policy and politics.
A pervasive, evolving conflict. Renée DiResta's concept of an "Information World War" highlights that we are immersed in an ongoing conflict where state actors, terrorists, and ideological extremists leverage social infrastructure to sow discord and erode shared reality. This war targets the human mind, aiming to influence culture, society, policy, and politics by winning over a sufficient number of minds.
Bernays' "invisible government." This echoes Edward Bernays' 1928 observation that "the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society." He argued that an "invisible government" of manipulators, often unknown to the public, truly rules by understanding and guiding public thought. This historical context reveals that modern information warfare is an evolution of long-standing tactics.
Inaction is complicity. In this environment, inaction is a tacit form of support for forces seeking to undermine information systems and manipulate society. As Howard Zinn noted, "You cannot be neutral on a moving train." The deliberate propagation of disinformation is proliferating, targeting the American public from various domestic and foreign actors. Therefore, active engagement and resistance are crucial for anyone who values truth, transparency, and participatory democracy.
8. Reclaiming Democracy Through Critical Media Literacy Education (The Five C's)
Media literacy education can help transform U.S. schools and strengthen democracy by emphasizing the Five C’s.
Empowering citizens through education. To counter corporate influence and manipulation, schools must undergo a public-interest transformation, prioritizing critical media literacy. This involves emphasizing the "Five C's" to equip students with the tools for intellectual self-defense and civic agency.
The Five C's framework:
- Civics education: Teaching the value of community, democracy, and organizing, analyzing corporate influence, and focusing on solutions and social movements.
- Critical thinking: Combating partisanship by teaching students to assess evidence, detect fallacies, and explore diverse perspectives, fostering open-mindedness and self-reflection.
- Critical awareness of media: Understanding journalistic processes, recognizing propaganda, and analyzing how media narratives are constructed, including the nuanced use of digital tools.
- Community engagement: Fostering empathy and active participation in local issues, connecting classroom learning to real-world problem-solving.
- Cultural competency: Increasing understanding and appreciation of diverse social, cultural, and political proclivities to mitigate intolerance and polarization.
Long-term societal change. This holistic approach to education aims to produce citizens focused on social justice, ecological sustainability, and the common good, rather than narrow economic self-interest. It requires a patient and committed populace willing to invest in transforming education over generations, moving beyond quick commercial fixes that only exacerbate vulnerabilities.
9. Transforming News Media for the Public Good (The BLEWs Framework)
As a pillar of democracy, the press should serve public interests over and above private ones.
Reimagining news for democracy. To ensure citizens are properly informed, news media must shift from serving commercial interests to prioritizing the public good. This requires a transformation guided by the "BLEWs" framework, advocating for a non-commercial, publicly funded media system.
The BLEWs framework:
- Broader news framing: Moving beyond partisan debates to include diverse scholars, professionals, and community voices, providing deeper context on issues like climate change and social justice.
- Local investigative journalism: Reinvigorating local news through government subsidies, tax reductions, and university partnerships to cover community-level issues and hold local power accountable.
- Educational news media: Developing non-commercial programming that explores issues in depth, links citizens to resources, and connects local and global concerns, moving beyond infotainment.
- Whistleblowers: Cultivating a climate where whistleblowers feel safe to expose corruption, with independent media providing secure platforms for data sharing.
Funding a public media system. The U.S. lags significantly behind other developed nations in public media funding (e.g., $2.25 per capita vs. Norway's $135). Initiatives like New Jersey's Civic Info Bill, which uses public funds to support local journalism, offer a model. A federally subsidized, but independently controlled, media system is crucial to counter corporate influence and ensure a diverse, credible information landscape.
10. Whistleblowers: Essential Guardians Against Secrecy and Corruption
Whistleblowers are the brave people who risk employment, reputation, friends, freedom, and sometimes their lives, to provide citizens with information that those in power attempt to keep secret.
Exposing hidden truths. Whistleblowers are vital for a functioning democracy, providing invaluable information that exposes unethical and corrupt practices within government and corporations. From Daniel Ellsberg's Pentagon Papers to Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, these individuals risk everything to inform the public about what those in power wish to conceal.
Lack of protection and media bias. Despite historical protections dating back to 1778, whistleblowers often face severe persecution. Under President Obama, more whistleblowers were targeted and prosecuted than in all previous administrations combined. Corporate media frequently attacks whistleblowers or questions their motives, rather than focusing on the significance of the information they reveal, as seen in the initial negative coverage of Snowden.
Cultivating a safe environment. To strengthen democracy, society must cultivate a climate where whistleblowers feel safe to expose corruption. This requires:
- Robust legal protections and public support.
- Independent media outlets (e.g., The Intercept, WikiLeaks) that provide secure platforms for whistleblowers to share information.
- A shift in public perception to view whistleblowers as courageous truth-tellers, not traitors.
Their contributions are indispensable for holding power accountable and ensuring transparency.
11. Collective Action is Imperative to Safeguard Democracy
Changing the system is possible. Doing so will require people to organize, agitate, and insist on policy—and a way of life—that prioritizes the interests of the public over those of corporations.
The cost of inaction. In the ongoing "information war," inaction is a tacit endorsement of forces seeking to undermine democratic systems and manipulate society. The deliberate propagation of disinformation is intensifying, targeting the public from numerous domestic and foreign actors. Relying solely on politicians or tech giants to self-regulate is insufficient; history shows they respond only to significant and sustained public pressure.
Organizing for systemic change. Transforming the system requires collective effort. Citizens must organize, agitate, and demand policies that prioritize public interests over corporate profits. This includes:
- Insisting on a non-commercial public media system, free from advertising and corporate influence.
- Advocating for increased media literacy and critical pedagogy in schools.
- Supporting independent journalism and whistleblower protections.
These shifts are crucial for reclaiming civic sovereignty and subordinating corporate power to the common good.
A call to a better future. The current trajectory leads towards an "ecologically unsustainable, corporate-dominated, authoritarian surveillance state." However, a better future is possible through renewed and revelatory directions that favor the public sphere and restoration of the commons. By acting together, we can arm ourselves with knowledge, foster deliberation, and live with greater democracy and dignity.
Last updated:
Similar Books
