Key Takeaways
1. Early America: A Land of Religious Establishments, Not Freedom
America was settled primarily by people who wanted rule of one religious denomination over others.
Colonial religious control. Contrary to popular belief, most early American colonies were not founded on principles of broad religious freedom. Instead, they sought to establish specific Christian denominations as the official faith, often with brutal results for those who dissented. This meant that:
- Virginia enforced Anglicanism with "Lawes Divine, Morall and Martiall," punishing blasphemy and requiring church attendance.
- Massachusetts established a "Holy Commonwealth" of Puritanism, where only church members could vote and dissenters like Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams were banished.
- Quakers in Massachusetts faced severe persecution, including whippings and executions, as exemplified by the martyrdom of Mary Dyer.
Persecution and intolerance. These state-supported religious systems actively discriminated against and punished religious minorities. Catholics, Jews, Baptists, and even other Protestant sects faced legal restrictions, harassment, and violence. Maryland, founded as a Catholic refuge, eventually saw Protestants outnumber Catholics and impose harsh anti-Catholic laws.
Failed experiments. Nearly all these colonial experiments in state encouragement of religion ultimately failed to achieve lasting religious uniformity or peace. The widespread persecution and the eventual weakening of established churches laid the groundwork for future generations to question the wisdom of mixing church and state. The victims of these practices were not atheists or secularists, but often other people of faith.
2. The Great Awakening: Fueling Revolution and Religious Liberty
To a degree rarely acknowledged, the American Revolution and the new approach to church and state that resulted were powerfully shaped by the Great Awakening.
Religious revivalism. The Great Awakening, led by figures like George Whitefield, was a dramatic wave of evangelical fervor that swept through the colonies in the mid-18th century. Whitefield's powerful, democratic preaching style challenged traditional religious hierarchies and emphasized individual, "born-again" experiences over formal doctrine.
Challenging authority. This revivalism fostered a spirit of questioning authority, first within the church and then extending to political structures. As new denominations like the Baptists grew rapidly, they often found themselves at odds with the established Anglican and Congregational churches, which they saw as stifling true faith. This antagonism to established churches naturally led to a reassessment of the traditional assumption that church and state must be connected.
Paving the way for revolution. The Great Awakening taught colonists to defy institutions that limited their freedom, whether religious or political. This defiance became "infectious," preparing many Americans to challenge British rule. Benjamin Franklin, an Enlightenment thinker, admired Whitefield's democratic appeal and supported his efforts, even helping to build a non-sectarian hall for preachers of all faiths, including a "Mufti of Constantinople."
3. Founders' Diverse Faiths: From Puritan to Pious Infidel
Each felt religion was extremely important, at a minimum to encourage moral behavior and make the land safe for republican government, each took faith seriously enough to conscientiously seek out a personal path that worked for him; each rejected major aspects of his childhood religion; and none accepted the full bundle of creeds offered by his denomination.
Personal spiritual journeys. The Founding Fathers, though often deeply spiritual, embarked on diverse and evolving personal faith journeys that defied simple categorization. They were not a monolithic group of orthodox Christians, nor were they all secular Deists. Their individual paths often involved rejecting core tenets of their upbringing while retaining a profound belief in God and the importance of morality.
Franklin's hybrid faith. Benjamin Franklin, born a Puritan, evolved into a "Puritan New Ager," blending his youth's morality-focused theology with Enlightenment reason. He rejected Calvinist doctrines like predestination, emphasized good works, and envisioned a benevolent God who oversaw a system of "deputy gods" for each solar system, ultimately seeking a "warm, loving God" and a society of "religious pluralism."
Jefferson's radical rescue. Thomas Jefferson, the "pious infidel," loved Jesus's moral teachings but vehemently rejected his divinity, miracles, and organized Christianity, which he believed had been corrupted by "priests." He secretly created his "Jefferson Bible" by excising supernatural elements, aiming to "rescue" Jesus's character and present "the most sublime and benevolent code of morals." His personal experience of being labeled a "heretic" fueled his passionate advocacy for religious freedom.
Adams's Unitarian evolution. John Adams, raised a Puritan, became an "angry Unitarian" who rejected the Trinity, original sin, and salvation by faith alone, yet believed Christianity's core principles were divinely inspired and essential for virtue. He balanced a noisy mix of feelings about religion, praising its potential for morality while despising its dogmatism and the "most bloody religion that ever existed."
Washington's pragmatic piety. George Washington, an Anglican vestryman, was deeply spiritual, believing in an "Invisible Hand" and an intervening God who protected him and the nation. However, he rarely spoke of Jesus Christ, did not take communion, and was described as more of a general than a philosopher in his faith. His commitment to religious tolerance was largely pragmatic, born from leading a diverse Continental army.
4. Religion's Role in the Revolution: A Holy War for Liberty
Not only did religion help trigger the Revolution, it did so in ways with profound implications for the later fights over separation of church and state.
Divine justification for rebellion. Religion was a significant, often overlooked, cause of the American Revolution. Patriot clergy provided biblical justifications for rebellion, casting King George III as a tyrant and the British as "Satanic." Figures like Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry invoked God to rally colonists, arguing that the fight for liberty was God's fight.
Anti-Anglican and anti-Catholic fervor. Antagonism towards the Anglican Church, seen as an extension of royal tyranny, fueled revolutionary sentiment. Fears of British religious meddling, particularly the possibility of Anglican bishops being sent to the colonies and the Quebec Act (which recognized Catholicism in Canada), ignited widespread anti-Catholic hysteria. This linked political and religious oppression in the minds of many colonists.
The rise of pluralism and tolerance. The war itself forced a new appreciation for religious diversity. George Washington, as commander of the Continental Army, banned anti-Catholic practices like "Pope Day" to secure Canadian allies and ensure troop morale among diverse soldiers. The Continental Congress, initially anti-Catholic, quickly reversed course to seek French and Canadian Catholic support, demonstrating that military necessity could foster religious tolerance.
5. The Constitution's "Godless" Compromise: Federal Neutrality, State Autonomy
The stubborn refusal of the US Constitution to invoke the Almighty is abnormal, historic, radical, and not accidental.
A secular foundational document. The U.S. Constitution, unlike most foundational documents of its time, is strikingly secular, making no mention of God, Jesus, or divine providence. This omission was a deliberate choice, reflecting the diverse religious views of the framers and a pragmatic recognition that a national religious invocation would be divisive.
Ban on religious tests. Article VI, Clause 3, stating "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States," was a radical departure. At the time, eleven of the thirteen states had religious tests for public office, banning non-Protestants, Unitarians, or non-theists. This clause ensured that the federal government would not impose such restrictions, though it did not prevent states from doing so.
States' rights and religious freedom. The Constitution's silence on religion, combined with the rejection of Madison's proposal to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, meant that religious matters were largely left to individual states. This allowed states to maintain their own "establishments" or forms of religious support, leading to a patchwork of church-state relations across the new nation. The First Amendment, when drafted, was primarily intended to limit the federal government's power over religion, not to impose a uniform separation on the states.
6. Madison's Radical Vision: Separation for Purity of Faith and State
For Madison, a tax designed to help religion—all religion—was morally equivalent to the establishment of a single official church.
Witnessing persecution. James Madison's commitment to religious freedom was profoundly shaped by witnessing the brutal persecution of Baptists by the Anglican establishment in his native Virginia. He saw firsthand how even "mild" state involvement in religion led to tyranny, with preachers jailed for "disturbing the peace" or preaching without licenses. This experience convinced him that religious freedom was a "natural and absolute right," not a privilege granted by the state.
"Memorial and Remonstrance." Madison's seminal "Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments" argued forcefully against a proposed tax to support all Christian churches in Virginia. He contended that such a "general assessment" was an "establishment" of religion, violating conscience, fostering clerical "pride and indolence," and ultimately harming religion itself. He believed that true faith must be voluntary and that government support would "dishonor" Christianity.
Alliance for liberty. Madison forged a powerful alliance between Enlightenment rationalists (like Jefferson) and evangelical Christians (like the Baptists and Presbyterians). While their motivations differed—rationalists sought freedom of thought, evangelicals sought purity of faith—they shared a common goal: strict separation of church and state. This alliance successfully defeated the assessment bill and led to the passage of Jefferson's Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, a landmark document asserting that religion is "wholly exempt from [civil authority's] cognizance."
7. Presidential Precedents: Divergent Paths on Public Religion
They disagreed.
Washington's "public religion." George Washington, with Madison's help, established a tradition of "public religion" in the new republic, using broad, nonsectarian language to invoke God in official pronouncements. He believed religion and morality were "indispensable supports" for political prosperity and issued Thanksgiving proclamations, but also famously declared that the U.S. government was "not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion" in a treaty with Tripoli, and championed full religious equality for Jews.
Adams's Christian emphasis. John Adams, the most overtly Christian of the early presidents, expressed "veneration for the religion of a people who profess and call themselves Christians" and issued explicitly Christian Thanksgiving proclamations, asking for remission of offenses "through the Redeemer of the World." His politicization of religion, however, backfired, leading to fears of a Presbyterian establishment and contributing to his electoral defeat in 1800.
Jefferson's "wall of separation." Thomas Jefferson, in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptists, articulated the concept of a "wall of separation between Church & State," clarifying that the First Amendment applied to the national legislature. While he attended religious services in the Capitol, he opposed presidential proclamations of fasting or thanksgiving, viewing them as unconstitutional and carrying "some degree of proscription" even if merely recommended.
Madison's strict separationism. James Madison, as president, consistently advocated for strict separation. He vetoed bills that would have incorporated a church in D.C. or granted land to a Baptist church, arguing these were "establishments" that violated the Constitution. In his "Detached Memoranda," he privately criticized congressional and military chaplains and most religious proclamations, believing that "perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters" led to greater purity for both religion and government.
8. The Enduring Legacy: Religious Freedom's Triumph and Ongoing Debates
America is religiously free. The Founding Fathers tried a radical new approach—and it worked.
Transformative shifts. The two centuries following the founding brought seismic shifts that further shaped religious freedom. The Fourteenth Amendment, passed after the Civil War, eventually applied the Bill of Rights' religious freedom principles to the states, leading to modern church-state conflicts over issues like prayer in public schools. Mass immigration dramatically diversified America's religious landscape, reinforcing the pluralistic impulse and making any official "Christian nation" claim untenable.
Culture war fallacies. Modern "culture wars" often distort the Founders' complex views, with both liberals and conservatives selectively quoting to support their agendas.
- Liberal Fallacy: Most Founders were Deists or secular (many were orthodox Christians, and even Deists believed in God).
- Conservative Fallacy: Most Founders were serious Christians (many rejected core doctrines, and the closest label for some was Unitarian).
- Liberal Fallacy: The Constitution demanded strict separation throughout the land (originally only for the federal government).
- Conservative Fallacy: Separation of church and state is a 20th-century invention (Madison and Baptists strongly advocated it).
A successful experiment. Despite ongoing debates and disagreements among the Founders themselves, their "radical new approach" to religious freedom proved remarkably successful. America today boasts a breathtaking amount of religious freedom, with government dictating no doctrine and diverse faiths flourishing. This vibrant religious landscape, coupled with relatively low religious conflict compared to other nations, stands as a testament to the wisdom of separating church and state.
Last updated:
Similar Books
