Key Takeaways
1. Women's opinion of men has evolved from need to disinterest and annoyance.
Women simply do not want men as much as men want women.
A shifting dynamic. The author observes a generational shift in women's views of men, moving from a historical necessity for survival and provision to a modern declaration of independence. This evolved through phases: acknowledging men weren't needed economically, then realizing women didn't desire most men romantically, leading to annoyance at unwanted male attention, and for some, outright hatred fueled by various factors.
Disinterest and annoyance. Empirical data and observable behavior suggest a widespread lack of romantic and sexual interest from women towards the majority of men. This is seen in:
- Online dating statistics (women finding 80% of men unattractive, low swipe rates)
- High female-initiated divorce rates (around 75%)
- Women flaking on dates (56-70%)
- Female obesity rates (prioritizing food/sloth over attracting men)
- Excessive tattoos/piercings (prioritizing self-expression over male preference)
Cultural reinforcement. This disinterest is amplified by cultural messages, from media portraying men as unnecessary or villainous to social norms punishing male romantic overtures (e.g., at work). This creates a climate of trepidation and distrust between the sexes, bordering on adversarial, and for a significant minority, manifesting as conscious or ideological hatred.
2. Men produce significantly more critical economic value than women.
Of the $25 trillion in GDP men produce $15.11 trillion of it, or 60.5%.
Unequal contribution. While the total US GDP is high, the contribution is not evenly split between the sexes. Men, despite having a slightly smaller population, generate significantly more GDP per capita ($91,970 vs. $58,992 for women). This suggests that removing men would immediately lower the standard of living to roughly that of Canada.
Categorizing labor. A deeper look at specific job categories reveals where this disparity lies. The author categorizes jobs by value:
- Worthless Jobs (welfare, obsolete, damaging): 2/3 women, 1/3 men
- Marginally Valuable Jobs (service, media): 52% women, 48% men (but men earn more)
- Real Jobs (needed for economy): 57% men, 43% women
- Critical Jobs (essential for existence): 70% men, 30% women
Real vs. frivolous. An all-female economy would see 50% of labor in frivolous or marginally productive jobs, requiring massive taxation or imports to function. An all-male economy would have two real jobs for every bogus one, leading to higher wealth and lower taxes, akin to living in Singapore or Switzerland based on gross GDP, and Monaco or Lichtenstein based on real production.
3. An all-female economy would face severe shortages in essential industries.
Society quite literally couldn’t wipe its ass without men.
Infrastructure collapse. Beyond general GDP, men dominate jobs absolutely critical for maintaining physical and technical infrastructure. Removing men would decimate capacity in essential areas:
- Construction: 1/5 the workers
- Mining, Oil, Gas: 1/3 the workers
- Transportation: Half the workers
- Manufacturing: Half the workers
Specific job shortages. Looking at highly male-dominated jobs (95%+ male) highlights the severity: mechanics, carpenters, electricians, construction laborers, machinists, welders, firefighters, truck drivers, repairmen, software engineers, civil engineers, plumbers, farmers, cops, military. Without men, there would be no running cars, housing, electricity, operating machinery, materials, computers, or functioning supply chains.
Third-world standards. Projecting these shortages onto daily life paints a grim picture: tiny living spaces (3% of current size), overwhelmed sewage systems (1/6 capacity), drastically reduced electricity (93% drop), severe food shortages (87% drop in farming), minimal car ownership (15% of one car per person), and increased crime (on par with Honduras). Averaging key metrics puts an all-female economy at the standard of living of Kenya ($5,700 GDP per capita), effectively a "war-torn, third world shithole."
4. Technological innovation is overwhelmingly driven by men.
Consequently, nearly ALL of humanity’s advances and standards of living have been made by, and are owed to, men.
Innovation is key. Economic progress and standards of living are fundamentally driven by technological advances and innovation, not economic policies. The question of who invents is paramount to predicting future prosperity.
Overwhelming male dominance. Research into major inventions of the past 50 years and Nobel Prizes in science fields (Chemistry, Physics, Medicine) reveals a stark disparity. While women have made some contributions, the vast majority of groundbreaking innovations come from men or all-male teams.
- Top inventions of past 50 years: Vast majority by men (microwave, LED, internet, etc.)
- Nobel Prizes (past 50 years, science fields): 136 to men/all-male teams, 14 to coed teams, 0 to sole-female/all-female teams.
Stagnation without men. The author argues that without men, technological innovation and progress would essentially halt or slow to a glacial pace. Society would struggle to even maintain existing infrastructure without men entering STEM fields and trades, leading to stagnation and decay.
5. Men are increasingly withdrawing from the labor force and social participation.
Men are simply exiting the labor force and doing the least amount of work possible, and at the highest rates in all of recorded US economic history.
Declining work ethic. Data shows a clear trend of men working less and participating less in the economy. The male labor force participation rate has dropped significantly since the 1950s (from 87% to 67%). Young men (16-19) are also less likely to seek work (35% today vs. ~50% historically).
Less activity, fewer hours. Beyond just not being in the labor force, men across age brackets are increasingly inactive (not in school, work, or training). Those who do work are working fewer hours annually (dropping from 2,060 in 2007 to 2,000 today). Men are also retiring earlier, though recent trends show a slight increase due to financial necessity.
Avoiding investment. Men are also less likely to invest in education or training for careers, particularly in college where they are now only 40% of students. While this might save them from worthless degrees, trade school enrollment is also stagnant or declining, exacerbating shortages in critical fields. This trend suggests a future where fewer men are equipped or willing to fill essential roles.
6. This withdrawal is enabled by the welfare state and lack of incentive.
Your basic, college-freshman democrat/socialist politics have merely enabled these men to remain parasitic boys.
Eliminating the "stick". The author argues that men's withdrawal is enabled by the generous welfare state, disproportionately voted in by women. Programs like EBT, WIC, Section 8, and parental subsidies eliminate the threat of starvation, homelessness, and cold, removing the negative reinforcement that historically compelled men to work for survival.
Removing the "carrot". Compounding this is the lack of positive incentive. Decades of cultural messages telling men they aren't needed, coupled with women's general disinterest or hostility, remove the "carrot" of romantic relationships, family, and social validation that traditionally motivated men to achieve and provide. Without a stick or a carrot, many men choose inaction.
The cost to women. This enabling behavior has ironic consequences for women. They complain about the lack of "good men," but their voting patterns created a system that removes the necessity for men to develop the work ethic and financial stability that define a "good man." Furthermore, women are increasingly bearing the financial burden of the welfare state they voted for, including the rising number of men collecting mental disability checks.
7. Sex and attraction are the primary motivators for men's economic production.
Sex (or more Darwinistically speaking, progeny) is what gets men out of bed in the morning...
The engine and the fuel. The author posits that sex (including love, family, and progeny) is the most powerful economic policy, acting as the primary driver for men's economic production. Men are the engines, and women are the fuel. Without this fuel, the engines won't run, regardless of other economic stimuli.
Men's core desires. To motivate men, women must provide the "fuel" of specific qualities that men are biologically wired to desire. These include:
- Physical youth and beauty (not obese, mutilated, or old)
- A sweet and kind demeanor (not nagging or combative)
- A willingness and enjoyment of sex (not obligatory or chore-like)
- A willingness and desire to hang out (showing genuine interest)
Foundation for family. Additional qualities that further incentivize men by enabling family formation are:
- Being a good mother (prioritizing children over career)
- Having no other man's children (avoiding genetic revulsion)
- Loyalty (commitment and fidelity)
- Not initiating divorce (removing the biggest deterrent to investment)
Modern "fuel" quality. The author argues that the majority of modern women lack these qualities (high obesity, debt, single motherhood, psychotropic drug use, body mutilation, high divorce rates), rendering them ineffective or even damaging "fuel" for men's economic engines.
8. Women's current choices conflict with economic reality and men's desires.
When women say they are "liberated" from men, they're not joking or trying to be edgy.
Prioritizing independence. The author contends that women's life choices reflect their genuine disinterest in men now that they are not economically dependent. They prioritize careers, education, travel, and self-expression over conforming to what men desire, as evidenced by their educational choices (worthless degrees), lifestyles (obesity, tattoos), and stated priorities (men ranking low).
Ignoring reality. While women are free to make these choices, they conflict with the reality of what motivates men and what is required to maintain a first-world economy. No amount of wishing or political ideology will change male biology or the need for essential labor. Women's choices, while personally liberating, are economically unsustainable when men withdraw.
The "Frankenstein soy boy". By telling men they weren't needed and lying about what they actually desired (promoting sensitive, effeminate men), women have socially engineered the very type of man they now complain about – the weak, financially unstable, emotionally-driven "soy boy" who aligns with their politics but cannot provide or protect. This is the consequence of prioritizing political correctness and politeness over biological and economic truth.
9. Society faces a stark choice: women step up, accept poverty, or return to tradition.
And so women, whether they like it or not, face an incredibly important choice and the consequences that come with it.
No consequence-free option. The author argues that society, specifically women, must confront the reality that men's withdrawal has removed a critical component of economic function. There is no magical solution or external savior. Women must choose one of three paths, each with unavoidable consequences.
The Three Choices:
- Be Equals to Men: Women genuinely step into traditionally male roles at equal rates (trades, STEM, critical infrastructure), abandon preferential treatment, and stop complaining.
- Consequence: Women must work significantly harder, perform physically demanding/dangerous jobs, and lose their freedom from labor, but standards of living are maintained.
- Maintain the Status Quo: Continue current trends of women's labor participation/choices and men's withdrawal.
- Consequence: Guaranteed decline in standards of living, likely economic collapse into third-world poverty, as the economy cannot function without sufficient critical labor. Women maintain their freedom from men and hard labor, but are poor.
- Return to Traditional Roles: Women return to primary roles as wives and mothers, economically dependent on men, while men return to being primary breadwinners.
- Consequence: Women lose their freedom and independence from men, subordinating personal dreams to family/husband. They must also maintain physical attractiveness. Standards of living are maintained or increased, and women work less outside the home.
Paying the price. The author concludes that women must pay a price for abandoning men's critical role: either through hard work (Option 1), poverty (Option 2), or forfeiting freedom (Option 3). There is no fourth option where they maintain independence, avoid hard labor, and keep first-world living standards.
10. The current path represents a tragedy for women who invested in an unsustainable system.
Their entire existence becomes one of failure, confusion, envy and anger.
A cruel paradox. The author views the current situation as a tragedy for women, particularly younger generations. They were promised liberation and the ability to "have it all" by feminism and society, investing their lives and resources (education, career focus) into this ideal. However, this ideal was built on the unsustainable premise that men's economic production would continue even as women withdrew their incentive (sex, family) and men were demoralized.
Investing in failure. As men withdraw, the economy decays, making the promised life (career success, financial stability, finding a quality man) increasingly unattainable for the majority of women. Their worthless degrees lead to debt and low-wage jobs, inflation erodes purchasing power, and the quality men they desire are scarce or avoiding commitment.
Confusion and dependency. Despite doing everything they were told, many women find themselves struggling, confused, and increasingly dependent on men (through webcam work, sugar dating, moving home, or considering unwanted marriage) or the failing welfare state. This forces them to confront the painful reality that their primary value in this system is often reduced to their sexuality, a direct contradiction to the feminist narrative they embraced.
Missed opportunities. The author laments the traditional lives and families women may have forfeited by pursuing this unsustainable path. He contrasts the struggles of modern women with the perceived stability and fulfillment of traditional roles, suggesting that the "patriarchy" they sought to escape might have offered a better life than the debt-ridden, lonely, and economically precarious existence many now face.
Last updated:
FAQ
1. What is "A World Without Men: An Analysis of an All-Female Economy" by Aaron Clarey about?
- Premise of the Book: The book explores what society and the economy would look like if men were removed or largely absent, focusing on the contributions of men and women to economic production and societal functioning.
- Central Argument: Clarey argues that men are essential to the functioning of modern economies, especially in critical infrastructure, innovation, and production, and that an all-female economy would face severe declines in living standards.
- Socio-Sexual Dynamics: The book delves into the changing relationships and attitudes between men and women, particularly how women's disinterest in men affects economic and social outcomes.
- Data-Driven Analysis: Using labor statistics, GDP breakdowns, and sociological data, Clarey attempts to quantify the impact of removing men from the workforce and society.
2. Why should I read "A World Without Men" by Aaron Clarey?
- Challenging Mainstream Narratives: The book offers a contrarian perspective on gender roles, economic productivity, and the consequences of modern feminism, which may provoke thought or debate.
- Data and Case Studies: Clarey uses government labor data, economic statistics, and real-world examples to support his arguments, providing a quantitative approach to a typically qualitative debate.
- Societal Implications: Readers interested in the future of gender relations, family formation, and economic policy will find the book’s predictions and warnings relevant.
- Red Pill/Manosphere Context: For those familiar with or curious about the "red pill" or manosphere literature, this book synthesizes many of its core arguments in an economic context.
3. What are the key takeaways of "A World Without Men" by Aaron Clarey?
- Men’s Economic Contributions: Men disproportionately occupy and produce in critical jobs (infrastructure, trades, innovation) that are essential for a functioning, high-standard-of-living society.
- All-Female Economy Consequences: An all-female economy, as modeled by Clarey, would result in drastically lower GDP per capita, infrastructure collapse, and a reversion to third-world living standards.
- Sexual Economics: The book posits that men’s primary motivation for economic productivity is access to sex, love, and family, and that declining female interest in men leads to male withdrawal from society.
- Three Choices for Women: Clarey argues women must choose between true equality (doing hard, critical work), accepting poverty, or returning to traditional gender roles—there is no consequence-free option.
4. How does Aaron Clarey define and analyze the concept of an "all-female economy"?
- Labor Force Analysis: Clarey uses Department of Labor and Commerce data to show that women are underrepresented in critical sectors like construction, utilities, transportation, and manufacturing.
- GDP Breakdown: He calculates that women produce about 40% of GDP, and that an all-female economy would have a GDP per capita similar to Canada, but with much less real productivity.
- Job Categorization: Jobs are divided into "worthless," "marginally valuable," "real," and "critical," with women overrepresented in the first two and men in the latter.
- Infrastructure and Innovation: The book claims that without men, essential services (electricity, housing, food, transportation) would collapse, and technological progress would stall.
5. What evidence does "A World Without Men" provide for men’s unique contributions to society and the economy?
- Occupational Data: Men dominate in fields like mechanics, electricians, construction, transportation, and engineering—jobs that are foundational to modern infrastructure.
- Innovation and Invention: Clarey cites Nobel Prize data and patent records to argue that nearly all major technological advances and inventions have been made by men.
- Complex Systems Maintenance: The book emphasizes that men are overwhelmingly responsible for maintaining complex systems (power grid, food supply, communications) that society depends on.
- Productivity and Hours Worked: Men work more hours on average and are more likely to be employed in physically demanding or dangerous jobs.
6. How does Aaron Clarey use the concept of "sexual economics" in "A World Without Men"?
- Sex as Economic Driver: Clarey argues that men’s motivation to work, innovate, and produce is fundamentally driven by the pursuit of sex, love, and family.
- Declining Female Interest: As women become less interested in men (romantically and sexually), men’s incentive to participate in society and the economy diminishes.
- Societal Consequences: The withdrawal of men from the workforce and social life leads to economic stagnation, lower productivity, and societal decay.
- Policy Implications: The book suggests that no amount of government intervention can replace the motivational power of sexual and romantic relationships for men.
7. What are the main criticisms of modern feminism and gender policies in "A World Without Men"?
- Affirmative Action and Quotas: Clarey criticizes policies that prioritize women in hiring and promotion, arguing they undermine meritocracy and discourage men.
- Welfare State Expansion: He claims that women disproportionately vote for and benefit from welfare programs, which enable both male and female laziness and dependency.
- Cultural Misandry: The book asserts that media, education, and corporate culture have become hostile to men, portraying them as unnecessary or even harmful.
- Trait-Based Value Systems: Clarey argues that modern feminism encourages women to derive value from their gender rather than their contributions, leading to societal and economic decline.
8. What does "A World Without Men" say about the future of male participation in society and the economy?
- Labor Force Withdrawal: The book documents declining male labor force participation, fewer hours worked, and earlier retirement as men lose incentives to work.
- Social Withdrawal: Men are marrying less, having fewer children, and increasingly living at home or alone, with rising rates of loneliness and mental health issues.
- Rise of "Basement Dwellers": Clarey describes a growing class of men who do the bare minimum to survive, supported by welfare, family, or low-wage work.
- Potential Collapse: He warns that if these trends continue, critical infrastructure and economic systems may fail due to a lack of skilled, motivated men.
9. What are the three choices Aaron Clarey says women face in "A World Without Men," and what are their consequences?
- Option 1: True Equality: Women do the same hard, critical work as men, abandoning affirmative action and preferential treatment. Consequence: More work, less freedom from men, but economic stability.
- Option 2: Status Quo: Continue current trends of low female participation in critical sectors and male withdrawal. Consequence: Economic decline, poverty, and societal dysfunction.
- Option 3: Return to Tradition: Women embrace traditional roles as wives and mothers, men return as primary breadwinners. Consequence: Loss of female independence, but higher living standards and family stability.
- No Fourth Option: Clarey insists there is no way to avoid these trade-offs; women must choose between work, poverty, or loss of freedom.
10. How does "A World Without Men" address the role of education, social services, and "worthless jobs" in the economy?
- Overrepresentation of Women: Women are concentrated in education, health care, social work, and administrative roles, which Clarey deems less critical to economic survival.
- "Worthless Jobs" Defined: The book labels many jobs in education, social services, HR, and activism as "worthless" or even GDP-destroying, arguing they do not produce tangible value.
- Resource Misallocation: Clarey claims that the proliferation of these jobs diverts resources from essential sectors, increasing tax burdens and reducing overall productivity.
- Cultural and Economic Harm: He argues that these sectors often perpetuate dependency, victimhood, and inefficiency, further undermining economic health.
11. What are the best quotes from "A World Without Men" by Aaron Clarey and what do they mean?
- "Men are the engines of economic production and women are the fuel they run on." This encapsulates Clarey’s thesis that men’s productivity is driven by their desire for women, and without that motivation, economies falter.
- "It is patently false, dangerous, and borderline-insane to say that women, let alone society, don’t need men." Clarey uses this to challenge the narrative of female independence, arguing that men’s contributions are indispensable.
- "There is no consequence-free fourth option." This quote summarizes the book’s central argument that women must choose between hard work, poverty, or traditional roles—there is no way to have it all.
- "The most important thing in men's and women's lives are each other and any children you might be lucky enough to have." Clarey concludes that social and economic health depend on strong relationships between men and women.
12. What practical advice or predictions does Aaron Clarey offer in "A World Without Men" for individuals and society?
- For Men: Clarey suggests men should be aware of the low return on investment in pursuing women in the current climate and consider alternative sources of meaning and purpose.
- For Women: He advises women to realistically assess their options and the consequences of their choices regarding work, relationships, and independence.
- For Society: The book warns that unless incentives and cultural attitudes change, economic and social decline is inevitable, and critical infrastructure may fail.
- Future Outlook: Clarey predicts a continued decline in living standards, increased dependency on foreign labor and imports, and a possible return to traditional roles if economic collapse forces it.
Review Summary
The reviews for "A World Without Men" are polarized. Some praise it as an insightful analysis of modern gender dynamics and economic trends, appreciating Clarey's direct approach. Others criticize it harshly, calling it poorly researched and misogynistic. Supporters find value in its economic arguments and critique of societal issues, while detractors view it as pseudoscientific and driven by personal biases. The book seems to resonate with readers who share Clarey's worldview but is dismissed by those who find his perspective offensive or lacking credibility.
Similar Books
About the Author
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
