Key Takeaways
1. The Illusion of Unending Prosperity
The ordinary human being does not live long enough to draw any substantial benefit from his own experience. And no one, it seems, can benefit by the experiences of others.
A collective delusion. The 1920s, often called the "Roaring Twenties," fostered an unprecedented sense of optimism and a belief in limitless economic growth. This era saw the birth of the modern consumer economy, driven by new conveniences like cars, radios, and dishwashers, all made accessible through the magic of credit. Millions of Americans, from middle-class families to seasoned financiers, became convinced that the stock market's ascent would never end, leading to widespread participation in speculative investments.
Credit fueled the boom. The widespread adoption of credit, particularly "buying on margin" for stocks, allowed ordinary Americans to invest with as little as 10% down, amplifying potential returns and drawing more people into the market. This created a powerful feedback loop where rising prices encouraged more borrowing and speculation, inflating asset values far beyond their underlying worth. Figures like Charles Mitchell, chairman of National City Bank, actively promoted this "Bank for All" philosophy, making stock ownership seem like a guaranteed path to wealth.
Ignoring the warning signs. Despite growing imbalances—such as the widening gap between urban wealth and rural distress, and early warnings from economists like Roger Babson—the prevailing sentiment was one of unwavering confidence. The market's self-perpetuating rise led many to dismiss caution as outdated thinking, believing that a "new economic era" had dawned where old rules no longer applied. This collective denial set the stage for a dramatic and painful reckoning.
2. The Clash Between Wall Street and the Federal Reserve
So far as this institution is concerned, we feel that we have an obligation which is paramount to any Federal Reserve warning, or anything else, to avert, so far as lies within our power, any dangerous crisis in the money market.
Defiance of authority. As the stock market soared, the Federal Reserve Board in Washington grew increasingly concerned about speculative excess, particularly the surge in margin lending. In February 1929, the Fed issued advisories discouraging banks from supporting stock speculation, hoping to cool the overheated market through "moral suasion." However, Wall Street, led by powerful figures like Charles Mitchell, openly defied these warnings.
Mitchell's bold intervention. Charles Mitchell, dubbed "Sunshine Charlie" for his relentless optimism, saw the Fed's actions as a threat to prosperity. When the market experienced a sharp downturn in March 1929 due to the Fed's stance, Mitchell dramatically announced that National City Bank would inject $25 million into the call loan market to stabilize it, directly contravening the Fed's policy. This move, hailed by many on Wall Street as heroic, effectively undermined the Fed's authority and reignited speculative fervor.
A battle of wills. The conflict highlighted a fundamental disagreement:
- Fed's view: Speculation diverted credit from legitimate business and threatened economic stability.
- Mitchell's view: The market should be allowed to determine prices, and credit was essential for growth.
This public defiance by a leading banker exposed the Fed's limited power and its struggle to control a market it barely understood, setting a dangerous precedent for unchecked financial behavior.
3. The Power and Peril of Speculation
The game taught me the game.
The allure of easy money. The 1920s transformed speculation from a niche activity for insiders into a national obsession. Figures like William Durant, co-founder of General Motors, and Jesse Livermore, the legendary "Boy Plunger," became celebrities, embodying the dream of instant wealth. Durant, with his audacious market manipulations and "stock pools," lured thousands of small investors into elaborate schemes, promising fantastic returns.
Livermore's uncanny instincts. Jesse Livermore, a self-taught trading prodigy, mastered the art of anticipating market shifts. He made and lost multiple fortunes, famously profiting from the 1907 panic by short selling. His philosophy, though often contradictory, emphasized:
- Patience: "Don't trade every day. There are only a few times every year... when you should allow yourself to make any commitment at all."
- Risk management: "Take small losses. Profits always take care of themselves. But losses never do."
- Market as a mirror: "Cause and effect run from the economy to the stock market, never the reverse."
Despite his own warnings against "stock tips," Livermore's public pronouncements often moved markets, showcasing the immense influence of individual speculators.
The dark side of pools. Investment pools, though deceptive and underhanded, were legal. Wealthy investors would secretly buy up shares, then artificially inflate prices through self-trading, drawing in unsuspecting public investors before "pulling the plug" and cashing out. This practice, in which even major institutions participated, highlighted the ethical ambiguities and inherent unfairness of the era's financial landscape, where insider advantage was often paramount.
4. The Political Weaponization of Finance
There’s nothing I’d rather do.
Raskob's political ambition. John Raskob, a self-made industrialist and executive at DuPont and General Motors, leveraged his immense wealth and business acumen into the political arena. Despite being a Republican, he became chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to champion Al Smith's presidential bid in 1928, driven by a shared opposition to Prohibition and a desire for influence. His appointment, however, alienated many within the Democratic Party and even led to his ouster from a key GM finance role.
The "Everybody Ought to Be Rich" campaign. Raskob was a vocal proponent of democratizing wealth through stock ownership, famously publishing an article titled "Everybody Ought to Be Rich." He envisioned a new investment trust that would allow ordinary Americans to buy diversified stock portfolios on installment plans, much like buying a car. This vision, while seemingly progressive, also served to normalize debt and encourage market participation at a time of rampant speculation.
Covert political warfare. After Smith's crushing defeat by Herbert Hoover, Raskob became a fierce opponent of the new president. He personally funded a covert publicity campaign, hiring journalist Charley Michelson to "smear" Hoover and his administration. This unprecedented use of financial resources for political sabotage aimed to:
- Undermine Hoover's public image.
- Blame the Republicans for economic woes.
- Pave the way for a Democratic victory in 1932.
This demonstrated how deeply intertwined finance and politics had become, with personal fortunes deployed as weapons in a bitter ideological struggle.
5. The "White Knight" and the Bankers' Illusion of Control
The day was past when the House of Morgan could rally Wall Street in such a crisis.
Black Thursday's chaos. On October 24, 1929, the stock market plunged into unprecedented chaos, with a blizzard of sell orders overwhelming the New York Stock Exchange. The ticker ran hours behind, and panic spread as brokers liquidated margin accounts. In this moment of extreme fear, Wall Street looked to its titans, particularly J.P. Morgan & Co., to stem the tide, echoing the legendary rescue of the 1907 panic by J. Pierpont Morgan Sr.
Richard Whitney's dramatic entrance. Thomas Lamont, the senior partner at Morgan, convened an emergency meeting of the "Big Six" bankers, including Charles Mitchell and Albert Wiggin. They pledged $250 million to buy up blue-chip stocks and stabilize the market. Richard Whitney, the acting president of the NYSE and a Morgan broker, dramatically strode onto the trading floor, loudly placing a $5 million bid for U.S. Steel. This theatrical gesture, earning him the moniker "Wall Street's White Knight," temporarily halted the rout and instilled a fleeting sense of relief.
A futile effort. Despite the initial applause and the bankers' reassurances, the intervention was ultimately ineffectual. The sheer volume of selling pressure was too immense for any single group, however powerful, to counteract. As Bernard Baruch wisely observed, "The day was past when the House of Morgan could rally Wall Street in such a crisis." The market's underlying fragility, fueled by excessive credit and speculative fervor, had grown beyond the control of even the most influential financiers.
6. The Personal Cost of the Crash
This is the darkest day in America’s history.
Widespread devastation. The crash of 1929, and the ensuing market collapse, inflicted immense personal suffering. While some, like Jesse Livermore, initially profited from short selling, many others saw their life savings vanish. The "death watch" atmosphere on ocean liners with onboard brokerages, and the desperate crowds outside the NYSE, painted a grim picture of widespread financial ruin.
Tragedy strikes the elite. Even among the powerful, the crash brought profound personal crises:
- James Riordan: President of County Trust Company, a close friend of John Raskob and Al Smith, committed suicide after his bank faced a run and he struggled with personal debts from stock speculation. His death highlighted the immense pressure on bankers.
- Charles Mitchell: Despite his public confidence, Mitchell faced monumental paper losses on his National City stock. His attempts to mitigate these losses through a "sham" sale to his wife later led to a highly publicized tax evasion trial.
- Winston Churchill: Lost a significant portion of his personal fortune in the market, leaving him functionally broke and reliant on speaking fees and writing to stay afloat. He also suffered a severe car accident in New York, further compounding his woes.
These personal stories underscored that no one, regardless of status, was immune to the market's brutal consequences.
The unraveling of confidence. Beyond the financial losses, the crash eroded public trust in institutions and individuals. The image of Wall Street titans as infallible leaders was shattered, replaced by a perception of greed and recklessness. This loss of confidence, as Herbert Hoover would later lament, was "purely psychological" but had devastating real-world effects, leading to hoarding, bank runs, and a pervasive sense of despair that would define the Great Depression.
7. Hoover's Misguided Laissez-Faire and Roosevelt's Assertive New Deal
Economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement. It is action that counts.
Hoover's initial paralysis. President Herbert Hoover, an engineer by training, initially viewed the stock market crash as a "purely psychological" phenomenon, separate from the real economy. He believed in a laissez-faire approach, arguing that "economic wounds must be healed by the action of the cells of the economic body—the producers and consumers themselves." This philosophy, inherited from his predecessor Calvin Coolidge, led to a reluctance to intervene directly, despite mounting evidence of widespread economic distress.
Ineffectual interventions. While Hoover did take some actions—lowering income taxes, increasing public works spending, and convening business leaders to pledge stable wages—these efforts were largely insufficient and often undermined by his own administration's conflicting messages. His insistence on maintaining the gold standard, for instance, limited the government's ability to expand the money supply. His political opponents, like William Durant, openly criticized his inaction, while Charley Michelson's "Hooverville" campaign effectively cemented his image as out of touch.
Roosevelt's decisive shift. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Hoover's successor, adopted a starkly different approach. His "New Deal" promised bold, assertive government action to combat the Depression. Upon taking office, Roosevelt:
- Declared a national bank holiday, temporarily shutting down all banks to restore confidence.
- Used "fireside chats" to communicate directly with the American people, fostering a sense of hope and trust.
- Scrapped the gold standard, allowing for greater monetary flexibility.
Roosevelt's willingness to challenge established economic dogma and project abundant confidence, even when his own economic understanding was "ludicrously superficial," resonated deeply with a desperate nation, marking a profound shift in the role of government.
8. The Pecora Hearings and the Demand for Accountability
The people of our day need a keener sense of moral direction to keep them from drifting.
Exposing Wall Street's secrets. As the Depression deepened, public anger at Wall Street intensified, leading to calls for accountability. Senator Peter Norbeck, despite his own conservative leanings, appointed Ferdinand Pecora, a scrappy New York prosecutor, to lead a Senate investigation into banking practices. Pecora, driven by a thirst for the limelight and a belief that bankers had much to hide, meticulously drilled into the shady details of financial institutions.
Mitchell's downfall. Pecora's relentless questioning exposed Charles Mitchell's questionable practices, including:
- Ignoring the Fed's warnings against speculation.
- Taking a $500,000 bonus in 1929 that was later reclassified as an "advance" to avoid taxes.
- Selling National City stock to his wife at a loss to claim a $2.8 million tax deduction, a "sham" transaction.
Mitchell's attempts to portray himself as a noble savior backfired, turning him into a public scapegoat. His eventual resignation from National City Bank and subsequent indictment for tax evasion symbolized the end of an era of unchecked financial power.
Morgan's tarnished reputation. Even the venerable House of Morgan, long considered above reproach, was not immune. Pecora revealed that J.P. Morgan Jr. and all his partners had paid no income taxes in 1931 and 1932 due to stock losses. He also exposed the firm's practice of offering discounted stock to influential clients, including politicians, raising questions of undue influence. These revelations, though often legal, appalled the public and fueled the momentum for sweeping financial reforms, demonstrating that even the most powerful institutions could be held to account.
9. The Enduring Legacy of Glass-Steagall
This bill has more lives than a cat. A cat has nine lives. This bill was killed fourteen times.
A hard-won reform. The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, named after Senator Carter Glass and Representative Henry B. Steagall, was a landmark piece of legislation designed to prevent future financial crises by fundamentally reshaping the banking industry. Its passage was a long and arduous battle, marked by political infighting and resistance from Wall Street. Glass, a staunch advocate for sound money and a critic of speculation, saw the bill as the crowning achievement of his career.
Key provisions and compromises: The final bill, however, was a product of significant compromise and external pressure:
- Separation of banking: It mandated the separation of commercial banking (deposit-taking and lending) from investment banking (securities underwriting and trading). This was a direct response to the perceived conflicts of interest exposed by the Pecora hearings.
- Deposit insurance: Despite Glass's initial opposition, the bill included federal deposit insurance (FDIC), championed by Steagall, to restore public confidence in banks and prevent future runs. This provision was overwhelmingly popular with the public.
- Aldrich's influence: Winthrop Aldrich, the new head of Chase National Bank, shrewdly leveraged the political climate to expand the bill's scope, ensuring that even private firms like J.P. Morgan would be affected, thereby gaining a competitive advantage.
The act aimed to create a more stable and transparent financial system, curbing the excesses that led to the crash.
A lasting impact. Glass-Steagall fundamentally altered the landscape of American finance for decades, limiting the scope of banking activities and fostering a period of relative stability. While later criticized and eventually repealed in 1999, its principles continue to inform debates about financial regulation. The act symbolized a decisive victory for Washington over Wall Street, asserting federal authority to protect ordinary citizens from the risks of speculative finance.
10. Human Nature: The Unchanging Constant
The greater the heights of our certainty, the longer and harder we fall.
The cyclical nature of folly. The story of 1929 is a powerful reminder that financial crises are not merely about economic indicators or regulatory failures; they are deeply rooted in human nature. The collective fever of optimism, the allure of easy money, and the tendency to dismiss caution as outdated thinking are recurring patterns throughout history. As the book concludes, "people will find new ways to believe that the good times can last forever. They will dress up hope as certainty."
Lessons unlearned. Despite the immense pain of the Great Depression and the subsequent reforms, the fundamental human tendency to forget the lessons of the past persists. The trauma of the crash itself passed relatively quickly for Wall Street, which was ready to move on by 1930. However, the rest of the country endured a prolonged period of economic malaise, leading to a deep distrust of financial institutions that would take decades to heal.
The need for humility. The enduring lesson of 1929 is not that booms can be entirely prevented or busts fully averted, but rather the critical importance of humility. No system is foolproof, no market fully rational, and no generation exempt from the temptations of irrational exuberance. The narrative serves as a cautionary tale, urging us to remember how easily we forget, and how the unwavering belief in perpetual growth can lead to catastrophic consequences.
Last updated:
