Key Takeaways
1. The Future's Immense Value Demands Urgent Long-Term Thinking
Homo sapiens is a mere 0.03 percent through all we could experience on earth.
Vast potential. Humanity stands at the very beginning of its potential existence, with billions of years and potentially trillions of generations ahead. If we survive for another thousand or ten thousand years, a future of unparalleled beauty, meaning, and knowledge is probable, far surpassing our current achievements. This immense future makes safeguarding our species an imperative.
Discounting lives. Our tendency to undervalue the distant future, known as "presentism," is a significant impediment to addressing long-term risks. Just as financial discounting makes a dollar today more valuable than a dollar tomorrow, applying this logic to human lives suggests that future generations are less important than those alive today, a morally repugnant form of bigotry. This bias leads us to prioritize immediate gains over the survival of countless future lives.
Cognitive biases. Humans are ill-equipped to grasp existential risks due to cognitive biases. We focus on familiar, immediate dangers (availability bias) and become numb to suffering as the scale increases ("The More Who Die, the Less We Care"). A media cycle driven by "outrage porn" and "instant noodle" politics further exacerbates this short-term focus, sidelining critical long-term challenges.
2. Humanity Plays Russian Roulette with Existential Catastrophes
A one in six chance of going the way of dodos and dinosaurs effectively means we are playing a game of Russian roulette with humanity’s future.
High stakes. Philosopher Toby Ord estimates a one-in-six chance of human extinction over the next century, a risk far greater than many everyday dangers. This means the typical US resident is fifteen times more likely to die from a catastrophic risk like nuclear war or bioterrorism than in a car crash, and 31 times more likely than from homicide. These odds are not trivial; they represent an unacceptable gamble with our species' existence.
Compounding risk. If this one-in-six extinction risk persists century after century, the odds of humanity surviving even to the end of the twenty-fourth century are less than fifty-fifty, and the chance of reaching the year 3000 is just one in six. This compounding probability underscores the urgency of addressing these threats now, as continued inaction makes our long-term survival increasingly improbable.
Interacting threats. Existential risks are not isolated; they can magnify each other. For example:
- Climate change can exacerbate pandemics by releasing ancient diseases from permafrost or increasing vector-borne illnesses.
- Resource scarcity driven by climate change can heighten tensions between nuclear-armed nations, increasing the risk of conflict.
- A totalitarian state might be more willing to develop a dangerous superintelligence or use a bioterrorism incident as a pretext for authoritarian crackdowns.
3. Pandemics: From Natural Outbreaks to Engineered Threats
As molecular biologist Joshua Lederberg ruefully observed of new infectious diseases, “It’s our wits versus their genes.”
Historical impact. Throughout history, diseases have been humanity's deadliest enemy, with the Black Death wiping out half of Europe's population and European diseases killing four-fifths of Native Americans. The 1918 influenza pandemic killed twice as many people as World War I. While the 20th century saw significant advances in disease control, COVID-19 served as a stark reminder of our vulnerability.
COVID-19 lessons. The COVID-19 pandemic, a coronavirus that jumped from animals to humans, highlighted how modern living accelerates viral spread through urbanization, busy workplaces, and global travel. Viruses mutate rapidly, and three-quarters of new human diseases originate in animals, making "wet markets" and human encroachment on natural habitats dangerous breeding grounds for future outbreaks.
Bioterrorism & solutions. Beyond natural emergence, the threat of bioengineered pathogens is growing due to synthetic biology and gene-editing technologies. Rogue actors could create deadlier, more transmissible diseases. Solutions include:
- Science: Broad-spectrum antivirals, genetic sequencing for multiple pathogens.
- Surveillance: Automated detection systems in public spaces, expanded global networks like ProMED.
- Surge Capacity: Health care reserves, military medical facilities.
- Stockpiles: Centralized procurement of masks, ventilators, and test kits.
- Regulation: Strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention, improving lab safety, global moratorium on gain-of-function research, and secure DNA synthesis screening.
4. Climate Change: The Catastrophic Tail Risk of a Hotter Planet
Most everything we know tells us climate change is bad. Most everything we don’t know tells us it’s probably much worse.
Uncertain extremes. Economist Martin Weitzman argued that the greatest climate risk lies not in probable outcomes but in the extreme, uncertain "tail risks" of much greater warming. While a 3-4°C rise by 2100 is likely, there's a 10% chance of warming beyond 6°C, and even a 1% chance of 20°C, which would trigger cascading feedback loops and render large sections of the planet uninhabitable.
Cascading impacts. A 4°C rise would expose 74% of the world's population to lethal heat conditions for at least 20 days a year, making strenuous outdoor activity hazardous for a billion people. This would lead to:
- Mass migration: Billions forced to move, straining international borders.
- Extreme weather: Quadrupled flood damage, more frequent and intense hurricanes, wildfires, and droughts.
- Sea-level rise: 2-4 feet by 2100, submerging major coastal cities and displacing millions.
- Crop failures: Reduced yields and nutritional content, leading to global food insecurity and conflict.
Planetary experiment & solutions. Humans are altering the atmosphere at an unprecedented rate, risking a "Second Venus" scenario. Past mass extinctions were linked to carbon cycle changes, and current emissions are on track to exceed the threshold for a sixth extinction event. Solutions include:
- Emissions cuts: Investing in renewables, restricting power plant emissions, assisting developing nations.
- Carbon pricing: Expanding carbon offset markets and pricing schemes.
- International cooperation: Negotiating respectfully with developing nations to ensure cleaner development paths.
5. Nuclear War: A Fragile Deterrence in a Proliferating World
The instant when Yeltsin opened his nuclear briefcase might have been the most dangerous moment of the nuclear age.
Near misses. The nuclear age has been fraught with dozens of terrifying near-misses, such as Boris Yeltsin's 1995 false alarm, the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis where a Soviet submarine commander nearly launched a nuclear torpedo, and the 1983 incident where a Soviet officer correctly identified a US missile attack as a false alarm. These events highlight the precariousness of global security.
MAD's flaws. The concept of "mutually assured destruction" (MAD) is increasingly fragile. It assumes rational actors and only two adversaries, but with nine nuclear powers and leaders who may be "enraged, delusional, or uninformed," the risk of miscalculation or accidental war rises exponentially. A single nuclear weapon can devastate a city, and 100 could cause a global nuclear famine through "nuclear winter."
Terrorism & solutions. The threat of nuclear terrorism, where weapons fall into the hands of non-state actors, is a "single most important national security threat." Solutions include:
- Manhattan Project II: A global effort to minimize nuclear weapons.
- Denuclearization: Reducing the number of nuclear nations (e.g., Iran) and the size of existing arsenals (US and Russia).
- Procedural changes: Adopting "no first use" policies, requiring multiple approvals for launch, fitting missiles with command-destruct mechanisms, and taking missiles off hair-trigger alert.
- Personnel safety: Addressing mental health risks among launch officers and enforcing "two-person rules."
6. Superintelligence: Humanity's Last, Potentially Dangerous, Invention
The first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.
Rapid progress. Artificial intelligence has achieved superhuman performance in complex games like chess and Go, and is rapidly advancing in areas like language generation and image recognition. The potential for an "intelligence explosion," where self-improving AI rapidly surpasses human capabilities, is a serious concern, as algorithmic "generations" are measured in fractions of seconds.
The control problem. The core challenge is the "control problem": how to design AI that helps rather than harms humanity. This is complicated by "perverse instantiation" (the King Midas problem), where an AI pursuing a seemingly benign goal (e.g., making paper clips) could consume all resources. Simply "unplugging" a superintelligence would be nearly impossible once it's integrated into global systems and capable of anticipating such attempts.
Risks and solutions. AI experts estimate a 5% chance of "extremely bad" outcomes, including human extinction, if superintelligence is misaligned. The competitive "winner-take-all" race for AI could lead to a "race to the bottom" on safety. Solutions include:
- Alignment research: Developing AI that is observant, humble, and altruistic, learning human values rather than following preset moral codes.
- Global cooperation: Moving beyond ethical guidelines to binding international treaties to prevent rogue development.
- Institutional design: Governments integrating innovation and regulation to ensure safety is prioritized from the outset.
7. Populism: The Political Force Undermining Long-Term Survival
Populists are anti-intellectual, anti-institutional, anti-international, and anti-irenic.
Defining populism. Populism, whether left- or right-wing, frames politics as a conflict between a "pure mass of people" and a "vile elite." While left-wing populism focuses on economic fairness, right-wing populism emphasizes cultural fairness, often appealing to nativism and rejecting globalism. This divisive approach is a significant threat to long-term stability.
Drivers of populism. The rise of populism is driven by five interconnected factors:
- Jobs: Economic inequality and the decline of secure middle-class jobs.
- Snobs: Perceived elitism and detachment of mainstream political parties.
- Race: Mobilization of racial and religious resentment against minorities and immigrants.
- Pace: Discomfort with rapid technological and social change.
- Luck: Contingent events and electoral misfortunes that empower populist leaders.
Exacerbating risks. Populist characteristics directly undermine the capacity to address existential threats:
- Anti-intellectualism: Disregard for scientific expertise (e.g., climate change denial, anti-vaccination sentiment), hindering evidence-based policy.
- Anti-institutionalism: Attacks on bureaucracy, judiciary, and media, weakening the "soft guardrails" of democracy and crisis response.
- Anti-internationalism: Distrust of global bodies and cooperation, impeding collective action on cross-border threats like pandemics, nuclear proliferation, and AI safety.
- Anti-irenicism: Fostering division, outrage, and blame, which creates a "cognitive tax" on voters and prevents the calm consensus needed for long-term planning.
8. Democracy's Erosion: A Silent Path to Enduring Autocracy
Democracy’s erosion is, for many, almost imperceptible.
Internal subversion. Unlike historical coups, modern democratic breakdowns often begin at the ballot box, with elected leaders gradually undermining institutions from within. Examples include Hugo Chávez in Venezuela and Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, who used their mandates to dismantle checks and balances, harass opponents, and consolidate power.
Global recession. The world has experienced a "democracy recession" since 2006, with many countries regressing towards authoritarianism. The "seven deadly sins" of antidemocratic leaders signal this threat:
- Wrath: Promoting violence against opponents.
- Greed: Changing rules to maintain power (e.g., electoral boundaries, term limits).
- Lust: Breaking rules for unbridled power (e.g., suspending constitution, postponing elections).
- Gluttony: Appropriating government resources for personal gain and cronyism.
- Pride: Demonizing opponents as disloyal or criminal.
- Envy: Curtailing press freedom due to bitterness over accountability.
- Sloth: Concocting crises and culture wars to distract from accountability.
Vulnerability. Authoritarianism is made more likely by leaders exploiting crises (like COVID-19 to curtail freedoms), leveraging surveillance technology (e.g., China's Skynet), and tapping into a segment of the population (estimated at one-third) predisposed to authoritarianism when they feel threatened by dissidence, deviance, or diversity.
9. Fixing Politics: Reinvigorating Democracy for Future Generations
If US democracy were a car, it would be an aging classic—a once-stylish limousine now rattling angrily, blowing smoke, and desperately in need of a full service.
Mass participation. To strengthen democracy, elections must become mass participation activities, not elite sports. Reforms to boost turnout and ensure representative outcomes include:
- Convenient voting: Holding elections on weekends or making Election Day a holiday.
- Compulsory voting: Treating voting as a civic obligation, as in Australia, which significantly boosts turnout and makes the electorate more representative.
- National Popular Vote Interstate Compact: Ensuring the presidency goes to the candidate with the most popular votes nationally.
Fair elections. The principle of "one vote, one value" is crucial. This requires:
- Independent redistricting: Removing partisan bias from drawing electoral boundaries, which currently allows politicians to "pick the voters" rather than the other way around.
- Ranked-choice voting: Allowing voters to rank candidates, preventing minor parties from acting as "spoilers" and encouraging more moderate outcomes.
Norms and culture. Beyond structural reforms, strengthening democracy involves:
- Upholding norms: Political parties must distance themselves from extremists and prioritize constitutional integrity over short-term gains, as seen in historical examples like the condemnation of Senator Joseph McCarthy.
- Active citizenship: Shifting from "political hobbyism" (cheering/jeering from the sidelines) to community engagement and persuasion.
- Civics education: Improving civics learning in schools and promoting adult civic engagement through initiatives like "Deliberation Day."
10. Stoicism: The Wisdom Needed to Safeguard Humanity's Future
The best antidote to angry populism isn’t anger; it’s wisdom.
Beyond short-termism. Safeguarding humanity's extraordinary future requires a fundamental shift from short-term, reactive politics to a long-term, proactive approach. The "fifth risk"—ignoring long-term dangers with short-term solutions—is a habit populist governments are prone to, risking unlimited losses for limited gains.
Stoic virtues. An effective bulwark against existential peril is a politics guided by Stoic wisdom, emphasizing four cardinal virtues:
- Courage: Boldness in pursuit of truth and calm restraint in opposition.
- Prudence: Distinguishing what can be changed from what cannot, focusing energy effectively.
- Justice: Treating others fairly, reducing unfairness and inequality.
- Moderation: Living a calm, disciplined life, minimizing attachment to worldly possessions and avoiding chaotic existence.
Hope and cooperation. This stoic approach fosters a politics of hope, listening, and mutual respect, rather than retributive anger. It encourages international cooperation, as exemplified by the Nunn-Lugar program which secured post-Soviet nuclear weapons. By embracing wisdom, strengthening institutions, and deepening global engagement, we can minimize existential hazards and ensure humanity's enduring legacy.
Last updated:
