Key Takeaways
1. Equity allocation in startups is often flawed, leading to unfairness and resentment
"Ask an old entrepreneur about the bad times and he will tell you how he was burned by a partner or an investor or a co-worker. The story is always the same."
Equity allocation pitfalls. Traditional methods of dividing equity in startups often lead to problems:
- Slicing the pie before it's baked: Founders predetermine equity splits without knowing future contributions.
- Slicing the pie after it's baked: Leads to arguments and feeding frenzies over perceived value.
- Fixed splits: Fail to account for changing roles and contributions over time.
These approaches frequently result in:
- Resentment among team members
- Lack of motivation
- Strained relationships
- Potential company failure
The importance of fairness. Treating all team members fairly is crucial for:
- Maintaining trust and motivation
- Fostering a positive work environment
- Increasing chances of startup success
2. The Grunt Fund: A dynamic equity split model for fair compensation
"Fairness is More Fun."
Dynamic equity allocation. The Grunt Fund model offers a solution to traditional equity splitting problems:
- Allocates equity based on relative, theoretical value of contributions
- Adjusts continuously as the company evolves
- Provides motivation for ongoing contributions
Key features of the Grunt Fund:
- Uses "pie" instead of actual equity during early stages
- Allows for flexible allocation based on changing needs
- Promotes fairness and transparency
Benefits of the Grunt Fund:
- Reduces conflicts over equity
- Encourages ongoing commitment from team members
- Adapts to the rapidly changing nature of startups
- Facilitates easy addition or removal of team members
3. Calculating theoretical value: Time, money, and other contributions
"All pie is created equal."
Valuing contributions. The Grunt Fund assigns theoretical value to various inputs:
Time:
- Calculated using Grunt Hourly Resource Rate (GHRR)
- GHRR = (Base annual salary x 2) ÷ 2000
- Travel time valued at ½ GHRR
Money:
- Cash contributions valued at 4x the amount
- Personal credit used by company valued at 4x if paid by individual
Other contributions:
- Business-enabling equipment: Purchase value or resale value
- Intellectual property: Development hours x GHRR + costs
- Relationships: Unpaid commissions x 2
Maintaining fairness. The model accounts for different types of contributions while ensuring equitable treatment of team members.
4. Implementing a Grunt Fund: Steps and considerations
"To implement a Grunt Fund, follow these simple steps: Appoint a Grunt leader, Assign a theoretical relative value of the ingredients provided by the various Grunts, Calculate the possible equity whenever you need to based on the percentage of value contributed by each Grunt."
Setting up the fund. Key steps in implementing a Grunt Fund:
- Appoint a leader to manage the fund
- Establish clear rules and expectations
- Track contributions meticulously
- Calculate equity percentages regularly
Considerations:
- Calibration: Adjusting theoretical base value to reward early contributors
- Pie partitioning: Isolating a portion of equity for founders
- Outgrowing the fund: Transitioning to formal equity structures as the company matures
Building trust. The Grunt Fund relies on mutual trust and commitment to fairness among team members.
5. Handling departures: Fair treatment of exiting team members
"When a Grunt leaves the herd, either by choice or by force, great care must be taken to treat the Grunt fairly."
Types of departures:
- Resignation without cause
- Resignation with good cause / Termination without cause
- Termination with cause
Fair treatment guidelines:
- Resignation without cause: Forfeit pie earned through time, recalculate other contributions without multipliers
- Resignation with good cause / Termination without cause: Maintain pie minus severance payments, company retains buyback option
- Termination with cause: Treat as resignation without cause, plus non-compete agreement
Importance of fairness. Treating departing team members fairly:
- Maintains positive relationships
- Preserves company morale
- Reduces potential legal issues
- Upholds the company's reputation
6. Legal and tax implications of Grunt Funds
"To help you get the most out of your Grunt-Funded company you will want to discuss liability, ownership rights and taxation with your lawyer."
Legal considerations:
- Forming a legal entity (LLC or Corporation)
- Protecting intellectual property rights
- Establishing ownership of assets
Tax implications:
- LLCs: More flexible for Grunt Funds, allows profit distribution based on pie percentages
- Corporations: Trickier, but possible with restricted stock and 83(b) elections
Importance of professional advice:
- Consult with Grunt Fund-friendly lawyers and accountants
- Ensure compliance with legal and tax regulations
- Protect the interests of all team members
7. Case studies: Practical applications of the Grunt Fund model
"Grunt Funds are all about action."
Real-world examples. Case studies illustrate the practical application of Grunt Funds:
John's Bicycle Attic, LLC:
- Shows how the model adapts to changing partner commitments
- Demonstrates fair handling of partner departures
PhoneMatcherator.com, LLC:
- Highlights the pitfalls of traditional equity allocation methods
- Contrasts with the fairness and flexibility of the Grunt Fund model
Key lessons:
- Grunt Funds adapt to evolving business needs
- Fair treatment of team members is crucial for success
- Dynamic equity splits prevent resentment and motivational issues
Last updated:
FAQ
1. What is "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer about?
- Dynamic equity split: "Slicing Pie" introduces a dynamic, fair method for dividing equity in early-stage startups based on actual contributions rather than fixed percentages.
- The Grunt Fund concept: The book centers on the "Grunt Fund," a system that tracks and rewards the relative value of each participant’s input as the company evolves.
- Focus on fairness: Moyer emphasizes that treating contributors fairly is essential for team morale, long-term success, and avoiding resentment.
- Practical guidance: The book provides step-by-step instructions, real-world examples, and calculations for implementing the Slicing Pie model in any startup.
2. Why should I read "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer?
- Avoid common equity mistakes: The book addresses the pitfalls of traditional fixed equity splits, which often lead to disputes and failed startups.
- Fairness and motivation: It offers a proven framework to keep all contributors motivated and feeling valued, reducing the risk of "disgruntled millionaires."
- Actionable and accessible: Moyer’s writing is direct, practical, and filled with actionable advice, making it easy to apply the concepts immediately.
- Real-world relevance: The book is based on the author’s extensive entrepreneurial experience and is validated by research and case studies.
3. What is the main problem with traditional equity splits in startups, according to "Slicing Pie"?
- Fixed splits are inflexible: Traditional equity splits (e.g., 50/50 or 70/30) are set too early, before the true value of each person’s contribution is known.
- Startups change rapidly: The needs and contributions of team members evolve, making early agreements quickly outdated and unfair.
- Leads to resentment: Fixed splits often result in one or more team members feeling undervalued, which can destroy relationships and the business.
- Difficult renegotiations: Adjusting fixed splits later is awkward, stressful, and can be a company-killer.
4. What is the "Grunt Fund" method described in "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer?
- Dynamic equity allocation: The Grunt Fund is a system that allocates equity based on the relative, theoretical value of each participant’s contributions as they occur.
- Tracks all inputs: It accounts for time, money, ideas, relationships, intellectual property, and other resources, assigning each a fair value.
- Rolling calculation: Ownership percentages are recalculated regularly, reflecting the current state of contributions and keeping things fair.
- Pie as a promise: "Pie" represents a promise to issue equity in the future, not actual shares, until a formal investment or company milestone is reached.
5. How does "Slicing Pie" define and value different types of contributions to a startup?
- Time: Valued at the Grunt Hourly Resource Rate (GHRR), which is the market salary the person would earn elsewhere, doubled to account for risk.
- Money: Cash contributions are valued at four times their amount, reflecting the higher risk and importance of cash in early-stage startups.
- Equipment and supplies: Only business-enabling assets are valued, typically at purchase or resale value, while incidental supplies are usually ignored.
- Ideas, IP, and relationships: Only "baked" (well-developed, original, non-obvious) ideas and productive relationships are valued, often based on time invested or negotiated royalties/commissions.
6. What are the key steps to implementing the Grunt Fund model from "Slicing Pie"?
- Appoint a leader: Designate someone to manage the Grunt Fund and make final decisions.
- Agree on valuation: Set fair, consistent values for each type of contribution before they are made, using the book’s guidelines.
- Track contributions: Meticulously record all inputs (time, money, resources) from each participant.
- Calculate and update: Regularly recalculate each person’s share of the "pie" using the formula: individual contribution ÷ total contributions = percent of the pie.
7. How does "Slicing Pie" handle team members who leave the startup (resign, are fired, or become disabled)?
- Resignation without cause: The departing member forfeits most of their pie, retaining only the actual value of cash or assets contributed, and the company may buy back their share.
- Resignation with good cause or termination without cause: The member keeps their full theoretical share, minus any severance, and is free to compete.
- Termination with cause: The member is treated similarly to resignation without cause, losing multipliers and subject to buyback.
- Death or disability: The member (or their family) retains the full benefit of their contribution, treated with respect and fairness.
8. What is the "Magic Number" in "Slicing Pie," and when should a startup stop using the Grunt Fund?
- Magic Number defined: The Magic Number is the negotiated pre-money valuation at which the company transitions from the Grunt Fund to formal equity allocation, often triggered by a significant investment (typically $1 million).
- Diminishing returns: When the theoretical base value (TBV) is so high that new contributions barely affect equity, it’s time to formalize.
- Predictable business model: If the company achieves stable revenue and growth, the Grunt Fund can be replaced with standard equity or option plans.
- Legal and financial formalities: Major investments or company milestones require formal legal agreements and equity issuance.
9. How can an existing company retrofit the Grunt Fund model from "Slicing Pie" if it started with a fixed split?
- Get team buy-in: Convince all stakeholders, especially "fat grunts" (those with more than their fair share), of the benefits of fairness and dynamic equity.
- Reconstruct contributions: Estimate past inputs (time, money, resources) as accurately as possible, using full-time, part-time, or half-time estimates if needed.
- Recalculate equity: Use the Grunt Fund formula to determine what each person’s share would have been from day one.
- Adjust and move forward: Issue new equity or adjust ownership to reflect the fair split, and continue tracking contributions dynamically.
10. What legal and tax considerations does "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer recommend for startups using the Grunt Fund?
- Form a legal entity: Set up an LLC or corporation to protect personal assets and clarify ownership of contributions.
- LLCs preferred: LLCs offer more flexibility for profit sharing and dynamic equity adjustments, aligning well with the Grunt Fund.
- Vesting and buyback: In corporations, use restricted stock with Grunt Fund-style vesting and buyback provisions, and file 83(b) elections to avoid tax issues.
- Consult a Grunt Fund-friendly lawyer: Not all attorneys understand dynamic equity splits, so find one familiar with the model to draft appropriate agreements.
11. What are the key takeaways and best practices from "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer?
- Fairness is essential: Treating all contributors fairly is the foundation of a successful, motivated startup team.
- Dynamic, not static: Equity should be allocated dynamically, reflecting real contributions as the company evolves.
- Track everything: Meticulous tracking of time, money, and resources is crucial for transparency and fairness.
- Adapt as you grow: The Grunt Fund is best for early-stage startups; transition to formal equity structures as the company matures or raises significant capital.
12. What are the best quotes from "Slicing Pie" by Mike Moyer, and what do they mean?
- "Fairness is More Fun." – Emphasizes that startups thrive when everyone feels valued and treated justly, making the journey enjoyable.
- "When people slice pie they usually do it wrong. They make one of two mistakes. They either slice the pie before they bake it or they slice the pie after they bake it." – Highlights the core problem with traditional equity splits and the need for a dynamic approach.
- "Pie isn’t equity, it’s a promise. Promises should be kept." – Reminds founders that early-stage equity is about trust and moral obligation, not just legal contracts.
- "If you bake it, they will come…" – Suggests that building a fair, transparent system will attract the right people and resources to your startup.
- "Grunt Funds aren’t for mean people." – Underlines that the model only works if everyone is committed to fairness and good faith.
Review Summary
Slicing Pie offers a dynamic equity split model for startups, providing a fair and transparent framework for allocating ownership based on contributions. Readers appreciate its practical approach to preventing conflicts and fostering collaboration among team members. The book's simplicity and actionable advice are praised, though some find it overly simplistic or challenging to implement legally. Critics note repetitive content and occasional self-promotion. Overall, it's considered a valuable resource for entrepreneurs seeking equitable ways to divide equity, despite some limitations in real-world application.
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub
digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.