Key Takeaways
1. Legal Project Management is the Essential Cure for E-Discovery Dysfunction
Project Management in Electronic Discovery is a prescription and cure for our fragmented and often dysfunctional electronic discovery industry and practice.
Addressing dysfunction. The legal industry, particularly electronic discovery, has long suffered from fragmented practices, escalating costs, and inefficiencies inherited from paper-based methods. The sheer volume of electronically stored information (ESI) has exacerbated these issues, leading to a rise in sanctions and a suffering justice system. Project management offers a revolutionary solution by integrating diverse roles and applying established principles to transform e-discovery into a collaborative, efficient activity.
Economic pressures. The legal services market faces significant challenges, including shrinking corporate legal budgets and a demand for reduced legal expenses. Law firms are under pressure to adjust billing models and find efficiencies, yet many struggle to fundamentally alter traditional legal workflows. Project management provides a clear path to sustainability and competitiveness by introducing structure and business sense to an industry not traditionally run like a business.
Beyond the billable hour. While some firms resist change, the adoption of project management principles is driven by client satisfaction and the need for efficiency. It allows for better management of scope, time, and cost, especially in data-intensive areas like discovery. This shift helps firms differentiate themselves, maintain client relationships, and thrive in a market that increasingly values predictable costs and streamlined processes over the traditional billable hour.
2. The EDRM Provides a Standardized Lifecycle for E-Discovery Projects
The EDRM was envisioned and created to address the lack of standardization in the industry.
A unified framework. The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) emerged from a critical need for standardization in the nascent e-discovery industry. Before its inception, there was widespread confusion and a lack of consensus on how to manage electronic discovery, leading to inconsistent practices and increased costs. The EDRM provides a universally accepted, easy-to-follow guide for workflow management, service delivery, and product development in litigation support.
Stages of discovery. The EDRM outlines a systematic, iterative lifecycle for e-discovery projects, ensuring a structured approach from start to finish. Each node represents a distinct phase, building upon the previous one:
- Information Governance: Managing an organization's data.
- Identification: Locating potentially relevant ESI.
- Preservation: Protecting identified ESI from alteration or deletion.
- Collection: Gathering ESI in a defensible manner.
- Processing: Preparing ESI for review (culling, indexing).
- Review: Attorneys examining documents for relevance and privilege.
- Analysis: Evaluating documents for insights and strategy.
- Production: Delivering responsive documents to opposing parties.
- Presentation: Displaying evidence in legal proceedings.
Efficiency and defensibility. By following the EDRM, legal teams and project managers can ensure that e-discovery processes are not only efficient and cost-effective but also legally defensible. This framework helps manage the massive growth of ESI, integrate technology effectively, and navigate the complexities of civil litigation, ultimately contributing to the truth-seeking process.
3. Traditional Project Management Principles Offer a Structured Approach to Legal Work
Project management, defined, is the structured application of skill, knowledge, tools and techniques to organize processes, activities and tasks designed to bring about a desired outcome that efficiently meets a project or business need.
Core methodology. Project management is not merely a tool but an operational theory and a methodical, disciplined approach to outcome-oriented work. It provides a framework for effectiveness, efficiency, quality, cost and risk containment, and the leadership of people, process, and technology. This structured application is particularly beneficial in legal discovery, where repetitive tasks, diverse stakeholders, and the need for efficiency are abundant.
Project lifecycle. All projects, regardless of industry, follow a consistent lifecycle through five process groups:
- Initiating: Defining the project's purpose and scope.
- Planning: Refining scope, estimating costs and time, developing schedules.
- Executing: Directing and managing the actual project work.
- Monitoring & Controlling: Regulating scope, schedule, cost, and quality.
- Closing: Finalizing activities and reviewing lessons learned.
These groups ensure consistent structure and strategic organization, guiding the project from conception to completion.
Knowledge areas. Complementing the process groups are ten knowledge areas that project managers must master, including Integration, Scope, Time, Cost, Quality, Human Resource, Communications, Risk, Procurement, and Stakeholder Management. These areas provide a comprehensive lens through which to manage all facets of a project, ensuring that inputs, tools, techniques, and outputs are meticulously handled to achieve project objectives within defined constraints.
4. Proactive Planning and Adherence to Rules are Paramount in Discovery
The rules “should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.”
Guiding principles. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), particularly Rule 26, emphasize that discovery should be just, speedy, and inexpensive, requiring cooperation and proportionality from all parties. This means discovery requests and responses must be reasonable, not unduly burdensome, and proportional to the needs and value of the case. Proactive planning, including early discussions and agreements, is crucial to align with these principles and avoid disputes.
Key procedural requirements. Project managers must understand the FRCP provisions governing discovery, even if they are not attorneys. This includes:
- Rule 26(f) Meet and Confer: Parties must discuss discovery scope, form, and costs, especially for ESI.
- Rule 34: Governs requests for documents and ESI, including specifying production formats.
- Rule 37: Addresses failures to comply with discovery, outlining potential sanctions for non-preservation or non-production.
- Rule 502 (Federal Rules of Evidence): Protects against waiver of privilege for inadvertently produced documents.
These rules provide the procedural foundation for all discovery efforts and inform the project manager's planning.
Mitigating risks. Failure to adhere to discovery rules can lead to severe consequences, including adverse inference instructions, monetary sanctions, or even dismissal of a case. Therefore, meticulous planning for the Rule 26(f) conference, developing ESI protocols, and ensuring proper certification of discovery responses are vital. The project manager's role is to assist attorneys in navigating these complexities, ensuring defensible practices, and tactfully advising on technical specifications and cost implications.
5. Information Governance Forms the Foundation for Litigation Readiness
It is only through the information an organization records in the normal course of business that it can know what it has done and effectively plan what it will do in the future.
Strategic asset management. Information governance (IG) is the overarching discipline of managing an organization's information assets to maximize value while minimizing risks and costs. In the context of e-discovery, effective IG means being "litigation ready"—knowing what information an organization possesses, where it resides, and how to efficiently preserve and collect it if needed. This proactive approach significantly reduces the burden and expense of discovery.
Core components of IG. A robust information management policy typically includes three essential elements:
- Inventory of Records: A comprehensive catalog of all documents and data, both paper and electronic, across all departments.
- Retention Schedule: A clear policy defining how long each type of record must be kept, considering legal requirements and business needs.
- Disposition Process: A consistent, defensible procedure for archiving or destroying records once their retention period expires.
Adherence to these components ensures that information is managed systematically and can be defended if challenged in litigation.
PM's role in IG. While IG policy development rests with the client, the project manager must understand these policies and the client's IT infrastructure. This knowledge is crucial for scoping discovery projects, identifying key data sources, and advising attorneys on the practicality and cost of data retrieval. By encouraging sound RIM practices, the project manager helps the client achieve defensible deletion, thereby reducing the volume of discoverable ESI and the associated costs.
6. Defensible Identification and Preservation of ESI is a Critical Duty
Once an organization or individual reasonably anticipates or becomes aware of threatened or actual litigation, a legal duty arises to identify and preserve potentially relevant documents and ESI in their custody or control.
The duty to preserve. The moment litigation is reasonably anticipated, a legal obligation to identify and preserve relevant documents and ESI is triggered. This duty is paramount, as failure to do so can lead to severe sanctions. The project manager plays a crucial role in assisting attorneys and clients in fulfilling this obligation, ensuring that no potentially relevant information is lost, altered, or deleted.
Key preservation actions:
- Litigation Hold: Issuing a formal notice to relevant personnel, instructing them to preserve all potentially relevant documents and ESI. This notice should summarize the dispute, specify what to preserve, and identify a contact person.
- Physical Preservation: Either leaving files in their original location with "locks" to prevent alteration (preservation in place) or physically copying them to a secure, separate location using write-blocking tools to maintain metadata integrity.
- Suspension of Policies: Temporarily halting automatic deletion policies, backup media rotation, and records disposition schedules that might affect relevant ESI.
These steps are critical to prevent spoliation and ensure data integrity.
Targeted approach. Effective preservation involves a targeted approach, identifying key custodians, relevant date ranges, and specific data sources. While full forensic acquisition might be warranted in cases of suspected fraud, it is often costly and unnecessary. Parties should strive to agree on the scope of preservation, limiting it to reasonably accessible and proportional data. Documenting all steps taken, including custodian interviews and any limitations, provides a defensible record of the preservation effort.
7. Precise Collection and Processing Drive Efficiency and Reduce Costs
If ESI is not properly collected using write-protection tools to preserve the metadata, the potential for problems later in the project—during processing, review, and production—will increase exponentially at each phase.
Foundation of integrity. The collection of ESI is a pivotal stage; any mishandling can lead to irreversible complications. It is imperative that collection be performed by properly trained personnel, such as certified forensic examiners, using industry-accepted software tools that track, verify, and write-block files. This preserves crucial metadata, which is data about data (e.g., creation date, author), ensuring the authenticity and admissibility of electronic documents.
Strategic collection methods. The choice of collection method depends on the case's circumstances and risk tolerance. Options include:
- Full Disk/Forensic Collection: A bit-for-bit copy of an entire drive, capturing all data including deleted files, typically for high-stakes or fraud cases.
- Directed/Targeted Collection: Gathering user-created files from specific locations, custodians, or within defined date ranges, often using keyword searches.
- Server-Based Email Collection: Exporting mailboxes as container files (.PST, .NSF) from email systems.
- Backup Media Collection: Restoring data from backup tapes, usually as a last resort due to cost and complexity.
- Social Media/Mobile Device Collection: Specialized tools and consent are often needed due to privacy and dynamic data.
Manual "drag-and-drop" collection is generally discouraged as it alters metadata.
Processing for efficiency. Once collected, ESI must be processed to prepare it for attorney review and production. The primary goals are to reduce data volume and facilitate efficient review. This involves:
- Filtering: Culling documents by date range, file type (de-NISTing system files), or other characteristics.
- Deduplication: Identifying and removing exact copies of documents (global or within custodian).
- Keyword Search: Applying search terms to identify relevant documents, ideally agreed upon by parties.
- Advanced Tools: Using near deduplication, email threading, and data analytics (conceptual search, clustering) to group similar documents and accelerate review.
These steps are critical for managing costs, as attorney review is the largest expense in e-discovery.
8. Systematic Document Review Balances Accuracy with Cost-Effectiveness
Document review—whether the client’s or another party’s documents—is not a rote activity, but a crucial, fact-gathering and case-building opportunity.
Strategic objectives. Document review is the most time-intensive and costly aspect of litigation, requiring a systematic and organized approach. The primary objectives are to:
- Determine relevance and responsiveness to discovery requests.
- Identify and protect privileged or work-product information.
- Redact sensitive information from otherwise responsive documents.
- Identify crucial documents for case strategy.
- Categorize documents for efficient use in later stages.
Effective planning and clear guidelines are essential for maximizing efficiency and accuracy.
Roles and responsibilities. A successful document review involves a collaborative team, each with defined roles:
- Lead Attorney: Directs and supervises the review, sets guidelines, answers substantive questions, and ensures consistency.
- Reviewing Attorneys: Examine and code documents for responsiveness, privilege, and confidentiality.
- Paralegals: May oversee aspects of the review, maintain logs, and coordinate supporting tasks.
- Project Manager: Defines scope, schedules, coordinates staffing, manages the review database, performs quality checks, and reports progress.
Clear communication among all team members is paramount to address issues and maintain consistency.
Leveraging technology. Technology-Assisted Review (TAR), also known as predictive coding or machine learning, offers a powerful solution for managing large volumes of ESI. TAR uses algorithms to categorize documents based on attorney coding of a small "seed set," significantly reducing the need for linear human review. While TAR enhances efficiency and consistency, human oversight remains crucial for legal accuracy and ethical considerations, especially regarding privilege. The project manager ensures the effective deployment and monitoring of these advanced tools.
9. Meticulous Production and Presentation Ensure Evidentiary Integrity
The single most important consideration when producing documents is consistency in the process.
Final delivery. The production phase is where responsive, non-privileged documents are prepared and delivered to requesting parties. This stage demands meticulous attention to detail and unwavering consistency to mitigate significant risks associated with sharing client documents. The project manager is central to this process, directing technical staff and ensuring adherence to all specifications.
Production specifications. A detailed, written production specification is critical, outlining:
- Document Criteria: Which documents to include or exclude.
- Bates Numbering & Endorsements: Placement and format of Bates numbers and confidentiality stamps.
- Load File Requirements: Compatibility with the receiving party's database.
- Data Fields: Which metadata fields to produce.
- Text & Images: Whether searchable text and TIFF images or native files are required.
- Delivery Media: Format (CD/DVD, hard drive, SFTP) and number of copies.
These specifications guide the entire production process and prevent disputes.
Quality control and presentation. Rigorous quality checks are essential before, during, and after production. This includes conflict checks for inconsistent coding, verifying redactions (and re-OCR to remove redacted text from searchable files), and ensuring all technical requirements are met. Finally, a small percentage of these documents may be presented as evidence in trials, arbitrations, or depositions. The project manager assists in preparing exhibits, synchronizing video depositions, and setting up courtroom technology, ensuring that evidence is displayed quickly, seamlessly, and defensibly, upholding the authenticity and significance of each document.
10. The Project Manager is the Indispensable Integrator in Legal E-Discovery
The project manager working in the legal business will not be able to do any of these things or make informed strategic decisions if they do not understand the context, the environment, and the nature of the legal process.
Bridging the gap. In the complex and rapidly evolving world of e-discovery, the project manager serves as the critical link between legal strategy, technological capabilities, and operational efficiency. They are not just administrators but strategic partners who translate legal requirements into actionable project plans, ensuring that the technical execution aligns with the overarching legal objectives of a case. Their unique blend of legal process understanding, technical acumen, and project management skills is indispensable.
Essential skill set. Beyond formal project management methodologies, successful legal project managers possess a diverse array of "soft skills" and leadership qualities. They must be:
- Communicators: Articulate, transparent, and tactful in managing stakeholder expectations.
- Leaders: Able to inspire confidence, motivate teams, and resolve conflicts.
- Analytical & Methodical: Capable of breaking down complex tasks and identifying risks.
- Flexible & Adaptive: Ready to adjust plans in response to the unpredictable nature of litigation.
- Industry Experts: Possessing a deep understanding of legal processes, technology, and e-discovery best practices.
These traits enable them to navigate the politically charged and time-sensitive legal environment effectively.
Driving efficiency and value. The project manager's role extends across the entire EDRM lifecycle, from initial information governance discussions to the final presentation of evidence. They orchestrate the use of technology, manage vendors, monitor costs, and ensure quality at every stage. By bringing structure, consistency, and a focus on efficiency, the project manager not only helps legal teams meet their discovery obligations but also delivers significant value to clients by reducing costs, mitigating risks, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of legal services.
Last updated:
