Key Takeaways
1. Asexuality Exists on a Spectrum, Challenging Traditional Sexual Orientation Models
There is no one asexual (or ace) story and no book can capture all of ace experience.
Beyond the Binary. Asexuality isn't a monolithic identity but a spectrum, ranging from sex-repulsed to sex-favorable, and including gray-asexual and demisexual experiences. This challenges the traditional Kinsey scale, which fails to account for those who don't experience sexual attraction.
Definitions are limiting. The ace spectrum includes gray-A's, who experience attraction rarely or weakly, and demisexuals, who require an emotional bond before sexual attraction. These nuances highlight the limitations of simple definitions and the need for more inclusive language.
- Asexuality is not an "internet orientation" but has existed for decades.
- The internet has facilitated discussions at a scale and volume that had not been possible before.
Fluidity and inclusivity. The ace community embraces complexity, allowing individuals to identify how they wish and for their sexualities to change and overlap. This fluid, inclusive definition blurs the lines between ace and allo, strengthening the movement's message.
2. Compulsory Sexuality Shapes Societal Expectations and Individual Experiences
Compulsory sexuality is a set of assumptions and behaviors that support the idea that every normal person is sexual, that not wanting (socially approved) sex is unnatural and wrong, and that people who don’t care about sexuality are missing out on an utterly necessary experience.
The pressure to conform. Compulsory sexuality, like compulsory heterosexuality, is a system of societal expectations that assumes everyone should be sexual. This pressure can lead aces to feel broken, passionless, or abnormal.
Manifestations of compulsory sexuality:
- Fear of a sexless population
- The "sex myth" that sex is the ultimate source of pleasure
- The commodification of sex, where having and flaunting sex becomes a form of conspicuous consumption
Internalized pressure. Even in religious environments that emphasize abstinence, compulsory sexuality can manifest as the belief that everyone struggles against sexual temptation. This can lead aces to invent struggles where none exist.
3. Aces Navigate a World Designed for Allo Experiences
Sexuality as allos experience it was completely foreign to me, and realizing this in my midtwenties recast much of my life.
The "energy" that others detect. Aces often wonder about the "energy" that allos seem to detect, experience, and express, but that they do not. This can lead to feelings of exclusion and a sense of living in a foreign culture.
Misunderstandings and assumptions. Allos often conflate sexual attraction with other types of attraction, such as aesthetic or romantic attraction. This can lead to misunderstandings and invalidate ace experiences.
- Sexual attraction is not sex drive.
- Sexual attraction is not physical arousal.
The Naked Attraction experiment. Watching the show "Naked Attraction" can provide a glimpse into the ace experience, where bodies are stripped of personality and sexual attraction is absent. This can help allos understand the ace perspective.
4. Race, Gender, and Disability Intersect with Asexuality, Creating Unique Challenges
Racial oppression is difficult to separate from class oppression and from gender-based or sexual oppression because they are experienced simultaneously and “the synthesis of these oppressions creates the conditions of our lives,” resulting in, for example, “racial–sexual oppression which is neither solely racial nor solely sexual.”
The whiteness of the ace community. The ace community is disproportionately white, reflecting broader power dynamics and the association of asexuality with white "purity." This can make it difficult for aces of color to find representation and feel welcome.
Stereotypes and expectations. Aces of color face unique challenges due to intersecting stereotypes about race and sexuality. Asian women may be desexualized, while Black women may be hypersexualized, making it difficult to claim an ace identity.
- Control of sexuality is a classic tool of domination.
- The project of self-knowledge is complicated by both racial stereotypes and our desire not to be controlled by these stereotypes.
Internalized oppression. Aces of color may struggle with internalized racism and question whether their asexuality is a reaction against stereotypes. Finding representation and support within the ace community is crucial for navigating these challenges.
5. Redefining Romance and Relationships Beyond Sexual Attraction
Breaking the link between aesthetic and romantic and sexual attraction makes it possible to understand each type on its own terms instead of mistaking one for the other.
Romantic attraction without sex. Aces can experience romantic attraction without sexual attraction, challenging the assumption that sex is necessary for romantic love. This requires redefining romance and exploring new ways to express intimacy.
The limitations of language. The English language lacks precise vocabulary for describing nonsexual forms of intimacy, leading to confusion and misinterpretations. New terms like "queerplatonic partnership" are emerging to fill this gap.
- Sexual attraction is not necessary for romantic love.
- The world is not a binary of aces and allos.
Challenging the hierarchy of relationships. Western culture often prioritizes romantic relationships over friendships and other forms of connection. Aces challenge this hierarchy, emphasizing the value of all types of relationships.
6. Consent and Asexuality: Navigating Desire and Autonomy
If someone cannot say no, any yes that is given is meaningless.
The good-enough reason. Compulsory sexuality can lead aces to feel pressured to have sex, even when they don't want to. This can result in a compromised "yes," where consent is given out of obligation rather than desire.
Hermeneutical injustice. Aces may experience hermeneutical injustice, lacking the language and concepts to understand and articulate their experiences of coercion. This can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, and anger.
- The "No means no" and "yes means yes" models of consent are inadequate.
- The ace perspective on consent must be a universal concern.
Rethinking consent. A more nuanced understanding of consent recognizes that it is a shifting process, not a one-time decision. This requires paying attention to nonverbal cues, building trust, and respecting the right to say no at any time.
7. Building a More Inclusive World: The Power of Ace Activism and Representation
If there were no compulsory sexuality, aces would not need a community for support.
The goals of ace activism. The ace movement seeks to dismantle compulsory sexuality and create a world where all forms of sexual expression (or lack thereof) are respected. This includes fighting for legal protections, promoting positive representation, and challenging harmful stereotypes.
The importance of visibility. Increased visibility of ace characters in media can help others recognize their own asexuality and feel less alone. However, representation must be diverse and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
- The ace movement grew out of opposition to the idea that sexuality must be a cornerstone of both identity and existence.
- The ace movement is a way of living that simply refuses to care about personal sexuality.
The need for intersectionality. Ace activism must be intersectional, addressing the unique challenges faced by aces of color, disabled aces, and other marginalized groups. This requires creating safe spaces and amplifying diverse voices.
8. The Nuances of Attraction: Aesthetic, Romantic, and Sensual
Sexuality is more than sexual orientation, and attraction is more than sexual attraction, yet humans can act as though sexual interest is the only reason we find ourselves compelled by others.
Beyond sexual attraction. Asexuality highlights the importance of distinguishing between different types of attraction, such as aesthetic, romantic, sensual, emotional, and intellectual. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of human connection.
Aesthetic attraction. Finding someone beautiful without that beauty being a sexual motivator.
Romantic attraction. The feeling of being romantically interested in or having a crush on someone.
Sensual attraction. The desire for physical touch, such as cuddling or holding hands, without sexual intent.
Deconstructing desire. By breaking down attraction into its component parts, aces challenge the assumption that sexual attraction is the primary or only reason for forming relationships. This opens up new possibilities for connection and intimacy.
9. Challenging the Sex-Positive Narrative: A Call for Sexual Choice
It is not necessary to follow in the exact steps of MacKinnon and Dworkin—I do not share their views on porn or BDSM or sex work—but their more critical attitude toward sex is worth revisiting.
The limitations of sex positivity. While sex-positive feminism has done important work in promoting sexual liberation, it can also create pressure to conform to certain ideals of female sexuality. This can lead to the marginalization of those who don't enjoy or prioritize sex.
The importance of sexual choice. True sexual liberation means having the freedom to choose whether or not to engage in sex, without judgment or pressure. This requires challenging the assumption that sex is always good and necessary.
- Transgressive personal sexuality shouldn’t be the price of entry to radical spaces.
- Sexual liberation shouldn’t be the sum of women’s liberation.
A sex-critical perspective. A sex-critical perspective acknowledges both the potential for pleasure and the potential for harm in sexual encounters. This requires a nuanced understanding of power dynamics, consent, and the social construction of sexuality.
10. The Invisibility of Asexuality: Erasing Ace Experiences
The label of asexual should be value neutral. It should indicate little more than sexual orientation. Instead, asexual implies a slew of other, negative associations: passionless, uptight, boring, robotic, cold, prude, frigid, lacking, broken.
The power of language. The lack of language to describe asexual experiences can lead to feelings of isolation and invalidation. Creating a shared vocabulary is crucial for making asexuality visible and understood.
Stereotypes and misconceptions. Asexuality is often misunderstood as a medical condition, a mental illness, or a sign of repression. These stereotypes can lead to discrimination and make it difficult for aces to be taken seriously.
- The world is big and complicated and the amount of compulsory sexuality, and the way it is expressed, changes according to context.
- Sex is associated with impurity and sin, and celibacy is required for some members of the clergy.
The need for recognition. Aces are not asking for special treatment, but for basic recognition and respect. This includes challenging the assumption that everyone is sexual and creating space for diverse experiences of attraction and intimacy.
Last updated:
FAQ
1. What is Ace: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex by Angela Chen about?
- Exploration of asexuality: The book examines asexuality as a sexual orientation, using personal stories, interviews, and cultural analysis to illuminate the diversity of ace experiences.
- Challenging sexual norms: Angela Chen interrogates societal assumptions about sexuality, desire, and relationships, showing how asexuality provides a unique lens on these topics.
- Intersectional and cultural focus: The book discusses how asexuality intersects with race, gender, disability, and culture, primarily within Western contexts but with calls for broader narratives.
- Broader implications: It situates asexuality within political, feminist, and social discourses, exploring how it challenges dominant ideas about sex, liberation, and identity.
2. Why should I read Ace by Angela Chen?
- Fresh perspective on desire: The book offers unique insights into desire and sexuality by centering asexual experiences, encouraging readers to question their own assumptions.
- Accessible and inclusive: Written in an engaging and clear style, it is approachable for both ace and non-ace readers, making complex ideas understandable.
- Intersectional approach: Chen addresses how race, gender, disability, and culture shape asexuality, providing a nuanced and stereotype-busting perspective.
- Cultural and social relevance: The book connects asexuality to broader issues like compulsory sexuality, feminism, and social justice, making it relevant for anyone interested in identity and relationships.
3. How does Angela Chen define asexuality in Ace?
- Lack of sexual attraction: Asexuality is defined as a sexual orientation characterized by a lack of sexual attraction to others, distinct from celibacy or abstinence.
- Spectrum of experiences: The book emphasizes that asexuality exists on a spectrum, including identities like gray-asexual and demisexual, reflecting diverse experiences.
- Not anti-sex: Many aces may enjoy sex for reasons like emotional intimacy, even if they do not experience sexual attraction.
- Clarifying misconceptions: Chen distinguishes between sexual attraction, sex drive (libido), and other forms of attraction, helping readers understand the nuances of asexuality.
4. What is compulsory sexuality, and how does Ace by Angela Chen explain its impact?
- Definition and origins: Compulsory sexuality is the societal assumption that everyone is naturally sexual and that not wanting sex is abnormal, building on Adrienne Rich’s concept of compulsory heterosexuality.
- Cultural reinforcement: Media, legal systems, and social scripts reinforce this norm, making it difficult for people to say no to sex, even in loving relationships.
- Impact on aces and others: Compulsory sexuality marginalizes asexual and aromantic individuals, leading to shame, coercion, and misunderstanding.
- Call for change: Chen argues that dismantling compulsory sexuality is essential for true sexual freedom and inclusivity, benefiting everyone.
5. How does Ace by Angela Chen differentiate between sexual attraction, romantic attraction, and other types of attraction?
- Sexual vs. aesthetic attraction: Sexual attraction is the desire to have sex with someone, while aesthetic attraction is appreciating someone’s beauty without sexual desire.
- Romantic attraction: Romantic attraction involves emotional interest or crushes, which can exist independently of sexual attraction.
- Other forms of attraction: The book discusses touch/sensual, emotional, and intellectual attraction as distinct ways people connect.
- Importance of language: By separating these concepts, Chen provides a more precise vocabulary for understanding diverse experiences of desire and relationships.
6. What is amatonormativity, and why is it important in Ace by Angela Chen?
- Definition of amatonormativity: Coined by philosopher Elizabeth Brake, amatonormativity is the assumption that a central, exclusive, romantic relationship is necessary for a fulfilling life.
- Cultural and legal effects: The book explores how amatonormativity privileges romantic relationships in social norms, media, and laws, often at the expense of friendships and non-romantic partnerships.
- Consequences for aces and aros: This norm marginalizes those who do not desire romantic relationships, leading to stigma, loneliness, and legal discrimination.
- Advocacy for change: Chen calls for extending recognition to diverse forms of relationships, such as friendships and queerplatonic partnerships, to combat amatonormativity.
7. How does Ace by Angela Chen address consent, especially in the context of asexuality?
- Complexity of consent: Chen critiques simplistic models like “no means no,” arguing that consent exists on a spectrum, including enthusiastic, willing, unwilling, and coerced consent.
- Hermeneutical injustice: The book explains how lack of awareness about asexuality can lead to people feeling coerced into sex without realizing they have the right to say no indefinitely.
- Consent within relationships: Societal norms often pressure people to have sex with partners, complicating consent and making refusal difficult.
- Alternative models: Chen highlights negotiation and ongoing communication about consent, as practiced in kink communities, as useful frameworks for all relationships.
8. What are queerplatonic partnerships (QPPs) as described in Ace by Angela Chen?
- Definition and origin: QPPs are relationships more intense and committed than typical friendships but not romantic or sexual, originating in ace and aro communities.
- Social and emotional significance: QPPs provide explicit commitment, mutual support, and emotional intimacy, challenging the hierarchy that places romance above friendship.
- Language and recognition: The book emphasizes the need for new vocabulary and social norms to describe and validate these relationships.
- Cultural parallels: Examples like “Boston marriages” and pop culture references (e.g., Grey’s Anatomy’s “You’re my person”) illustrate the concept.
9. How does Ace by Angela Chen explore the intersection of asexuality with race and disability?
- Race and representation: Chen discusses the erasure and stereotyping of aces of color, highlighting the need for more inclusive communities and media representation.
- Disability and asexuality: The book addresses how disabled people are often desexualized or assumed to be asexual, complicating their sexual identities and experiences.
- Intersectional oppression: Aces of color and disabled aces face compounded marginalization due to overlapping social prejudices.
- Community inclusivity: Chen advocates for greater inclusivity within ace communities and activism to address these intersectional challenges.
10. What is the “gold-star asexual” concept in Ace by Angela Chen, and why is it problematic?
- Definition of gold-star ace: The “gold-star asexual” is a mythical ideal of an ace person who is “pure”—never abused, never disabled, never questioned, and never fluid in their orientation.
- Exclusion and pressure: This concept creates exclusion and pressure within the ace community, invalidating those with complex or intersecting identities.
- Social control and doubt: The obsession with proving “true” asexuality stems from compulsory sexuality and societal disbelief, leading to self-doubt and gatekeeping.
- Call for inclusivity: Chen argues that no one fits the gold-star ideal and that the community should embrace all aces regardless of origin, history, or complexity.
11. How does Ace by Angela Chen critique sex-positive feminism and its relationship to asexuality?
- Sex-positive feminism critique: The book discusses how sex-positive feminism sometimes equates sexual liberation with having lots of sex or kink, creating new norms that exclude sexually indifferent women.
- Pressure on women: Women who don’t want sex can be seen as repressed or politically immature, leading to internalized shame and social pressure to conform.
- Complex feminist perspectives: Chen acknowledges the value of sex-positive feminism but also revisits sex-negative feminist critiques, advocating for a broader, more inclusive understanding of liberation.
- Asexuality and empowerment: Asexuality challenges the idea that sexual desire is necessary for empowerment, showing that personal liberation can exist without sex.
12. What are the key takeaways from Ace by Angela Chen about the meaning of sex, desire, and relationships?
- Asexuality is diverse: There is no single ace experience; asexuality exists on a spectrum with many variations and intersections with other identities.
- Sex and intimacy are distinct: The book stresses that intimacy and emotional connection do not require sex, and that sex can be separated from love, desire, and fulfillment.
- Compulsory sexuality and amatonormativity harm: Societal expectations about sex and romance marginalize aces and others who deviate from these norms, creating pressure and misunderstanding.
- Vision for the future: Chen envisions a society where people can freely say yes or no to sex and romance without coercion or stigma, embracing a broad spectrum of human connection and pleasure.
Review Summary
Ace is a thought-provoking exploration of asexuality that challenges societal norms around sex and relationships. Readers praise Chen's nuanced approach, intersectional analysis, and inclusion of diverse ace experiences. Many found the book eye-opening and validating, appreciating its discussion of compulsory sexuality, consent, and the spectrum of romantic and sexual attraction. While some critics found parts repetitive or overly personal, most reviewers highly recommend it as an important read for both ace and allosexual individuals seeking to understand sexuality and relationships more deeply.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
